vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. (LOGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $721.6M, roughly 2.0× Celsius Holdings, Inc.). LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs 3.4%, a 14.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celsius Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (117.2% vs 6.1%). LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($465.6M vs $-130.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.4% CAGR vs 18.5%).
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.
Logitech International S.A. is a Swiss multinational manufacturer of computer peripherals and software. Headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland, the company has offices throughout Europe, Asia, Oceania, and the Americas. It is a component of the Swiss Market Index, and is listed on the Nasdaq.
CELH vs LOGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $721.6M | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $24.7M | $251.0M |
| Gross Margin | 47.4% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 20.1% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 17.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 117.2% | 6.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 231.1% | 25.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $721.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $725.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $739.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $355.7M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $24.7M | $251.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-61.0M | $170.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.9M | $146.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.4M | $144.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $200.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $145.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $141.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.8M | $167.6M |
| Q4 25 | 47.4% | 43.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.3% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.5% | 41.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.3% | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.2% | 42.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | 43.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.0% | 42.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.2% | 43.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.2% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.4% | 12.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.7% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.9% | 16.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.27 | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $0.98 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.15 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $0.92 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.27 | $1.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $398.9M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $676.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $4.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $398.9M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $806.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $615.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $977.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $890.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $903.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $903.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $879.5M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $676.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $870.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $443.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $399.9M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $423.6M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $415.8M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $338.2M | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $3.6B |
| Q4 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-119.4M | $480.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-130.0M | $465.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -18.0% | 32.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -4.83× | 1.91× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $323.4M | $903.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-119.4M | $480.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.8M | $228.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.7M | $125.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.4M | $129.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.7M | $370.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $166.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.6M | $176.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.6M | $239.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-130.0M | $465.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.5M | $212.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5M | $108.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.4M | $116.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.3M | $356.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $151.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $161.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.1M | $228.8M |
| Q4 25 | -18.0% | 32.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.3% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.2% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.6% | 22.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | -4.83× | 1.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.33× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.03× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.73× | 1.43× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CELH
Segment breakdown not available.
LOGI
| Retail Gaming | $482.7M | 34% |
| Retail Keyboards Desktops | $254.6M | 18% |
| Retail Pointing Devices | $241.2M | 17% |
| Retail Video Collaboration | $193.3M | 14% |
| Retail Tablet And Other Accessories | $93.6M | 7% |
| Retail Webcams | $82.3M | 6% |
| Retail Headsets | $45.9M | 3% |
| Other Retail Products | $28.0M | 2% |