vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and Snap-on (SNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snap-on is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $721.6M, roughly 1.7× Celsius Holdings, Inc.). Snap-on runs the higher net margin — 21.3% vs 3.4%, a 17.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celsius Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (117.2% vs 2.7%). Snap-on produced more free cash flow last quarter ($254.6M vs $-130.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.4% CAGR vs 2.0%).
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.
Snap-on Incorporated is an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end tools and equipment for professional use in the transportation industry, including the automotive, heavy duty, equipment, marine, aviation, and railroad industries. Headquartered in Kenosha, Wisconsin, since 1930, Snap-on also distributes lower-end tools under the brand name Blue-Point. Their primary competitors include Matco, Mac Tools, and Cornwell Tools.
CELH vs SNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $721.6M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $24.7M | $260.7M |
| Gross Margin | 47.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 117.2% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 231.1% | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $4.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $721.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $725.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $739.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $355.7M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $24.7M | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-61.0M | $265.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.9M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.4M | $240.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $271.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.8M | $263.5M |
| Q4 25 | 47.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 51.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.2% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.4% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.5% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.9% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.27 | $5.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $4.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.15 | $4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | $4.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $4.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $5.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.27 | $4.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $398.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $676.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | — |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $398.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $806.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $615.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $977.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $890.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $903.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $903.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $879.5M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $676.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $870.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $443.1M | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $399.9M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $423.6M | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $415.8M | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $338.2M | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $8.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | 0.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-119.4M | $268.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-130.0M | $254.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -18.0% | 20.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -4.83× | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $323.4M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-119.4M | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.8M | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.7M | $237.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.4M | $298.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.7M | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.6M | $301.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $134.6M | $348.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-130.0M | $254.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.5M | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5M | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.4M | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.3M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $277.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.1M | $326.9M |
| Q4 25 | -18.0% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.3% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.3% | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.2% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.6% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | -4.83× | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.33× | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.03× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.73× | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
