vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and CMB.TECH NV (CMBT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CENTURY ALUMINUM CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($633.7M vs $592.8M, roughly 1.1× CMB.TECH NV). CMB.TECH NV runs the higher net margin — 32.3% vs 0.3%, a 32.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.4% vs -34.6%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
CMB.TECH, before October 2024 known as Euronav, is a crude oil tanker transport company, which consists of VLCCs, Suezmaxes and FSOs.
CENX vs CMBT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $592.8M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $191.2M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 46.4% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 32.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | -34.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | -63.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $1.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $592.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $489.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | $191.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 46.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $1.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.26 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | $38.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $3.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.20× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $38.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $601.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.20× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | $204.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | 1.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $204.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.06× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
CMBT
Segment breakdown not available.
