vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and M/I HOMES, INC. (MHO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
M/I HOMES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $633.7M, roughly 1.8× CENTURY ALUMINUM CO). M/I HOMES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 5.6% vs 0.3%, a 5.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.4% vs -4.8%). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($67.7M vs $-13.0M). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 4.7%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
M/I Homes, Inc. is a leading U.S. residential construction company that designs, builds and sells single-family homes, townhomes and duplexes across multiple U.S. states. It caters to entry-level, move-up and luxury homebuyers, offering energy-efficient designs, flexible floor plans and personalized customization options.
CENX vs MHO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $64.0M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | -4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | -52.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $2.42 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $976.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $489.5M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $106.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $121.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $111.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | $133.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $145.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $146.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.8M | $138.1M |
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 25.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 27.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.4% | 13.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $2.42 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $3.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $4.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $3.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $4.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $5.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $5.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.26 | $4.78 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $601.5M | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $4.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | $-8.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | $-13.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | -1.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | -0.14× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | $127.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $37.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | $64.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $-67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $27.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.8M | $115.8M |
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $42.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | $35.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | $102.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $-68.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $22.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.5M | $115.5M |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.1% | 11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | -0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | 0.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | -0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.06× | 0.84× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
MHO
| Southern Homebuilding | $615.6M | 54% |
| Northern Homebuilding | $503.9M | 44% |
| Financial Service | $27.8M | 2% |
| Land | $4.7M | 0% |