vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and MODINE MANUFACTURING CO (MOD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MODINE MANUFACTURING CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($805.0M vs $633.7M, roughly 1.3× CENTURY ALUMINUM CO). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO runs the higher net margin — 0.3% vs -5.9%, a 6.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.5% vs 0.4%). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($67.7M vs $-17.1M). Over the past eight quarters, MODINE MANUFACTURING CO's revenue compounded faster (15.5% CAGR vs 13.8%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
Modine Manufacturing is a thermal management company established in 1916 in the United States. The company started as Modine Manufacturing Company by Arthur B Modine who patented the Spirex radiator for tractors. The Modine company manufactured the Turbotube radiator for Ford Model T cars. The company built the world's first vehicular wind tunnel in Racine, Wisconsin in 1941. During WWII, Modine manufactured aftercoolers for the P-51 Mustang fighter plane. After WWII, Modine introduced the Ai...
CENX vs MOD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $805.0M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-47.4M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 11.1% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | -5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 30.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | -215.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | $805.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | $738.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | $682.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $647.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $616.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | $658.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $661.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $489.5M | $603.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $-47.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $51.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $49.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | $41.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $47.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.8M | $25.8M |
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 25.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 22.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.4% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $0.76 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $0.86 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.26 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | $98.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $570.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | $98.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | $83.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $124.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | $71.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $83.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | $72.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.5M | $60.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $570.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $525.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $482.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $296.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $330.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $359.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $405.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $399.9M |
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | $910.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $855.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $858.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | $788.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $601.5M | $747.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | $24.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | $-17.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | -2.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 5.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | $-20.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | $24.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $27.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | $54.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $60.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $40.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.8M | $39.6M |
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $-30.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | $200.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | $27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | $44.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.5M | $-4.3M |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.1% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | 1.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | 1.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.06× | 1.53× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
MOD
| Data Centers | $296.9M | 37% |
| Performance Technologies | $266.0M | 33% |
| Hvac Technologies | $107.1M | 13% |
| Air Cooled | $92.4M | 11% |
| Lb White | $25.6M | 3% |
| Climate By Design | $10.2M | 1% |
| Absolutaire | $7.0M | 1% |
