vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and Cloudflare, Inc. (NET). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CENTURY ALUMINUM CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($633.7M vs $614.5M, roughly 1.0× Cloudflare, Inc.). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO runs the higher net margin — 0.3% vs -2.0%, a 2.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cloudflare, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (33.6% vs 0.4%). Cloudflare, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($105.2M vs $67.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Cloudflare, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.4% CAGR vs 13.8%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
Cloudflare, Inc. is an American technology company headquartered in San Francisco, California, that provides a range of internet services, including content delivery network (CDN) services, cloud cybersecurity, DDoS mitigation, and ICANN-accredited domain registration. The company's services act primarily as a reverse proxy between website visitors and a customer's hosting provider, improving performance and protecting against malicious traffic.
CENX vs NET — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $614.5M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-12.1M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | 73.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | -8.0% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | -2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 33.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | 6.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | $614.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | $562.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | $512.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $479.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $459.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | $430.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $401.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $489.5M | $378.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $-50.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $-38.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $-15.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.8M | $-35.5M |
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | 73.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 74.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 75.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 76.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 77.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 77.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | -8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | -13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | -7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | -7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | -8.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | -14.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | -9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.4% | -9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.26 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | $943.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $6.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | $943.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | $204.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $147.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $182.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | $157.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.5M | $254.4M |
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $973.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | $881.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $601.5M | $797.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | $190.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | $105.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | 17.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 13.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | $287.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | $190.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $167.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $99.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | $145.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $127.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $104.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $74.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.8M | $73.6M |
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | $105.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $82.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | $39.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | $59.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | $54.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $54.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $45.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.5M | $41.5M |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.1% | 11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 15.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 8.5% |
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.06× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
NET
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $438.5M | 71% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $176.0M | 29% |
