vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (PCOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CENTURY ALUMINUM CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($633.7M vs $349.1M, roughly 1.8× PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO runs the higher net margin — 0.3% vs -10.8%, a 11.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.6% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 10.8%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
Procore Technologies is an American construction management software as a service company founded in 2002, with headquarters in Carpinteria, California. Procore hosts a platform to connect those involved in the construction industry on a global platform. The software allows for the creation of simplified workflows and displays a consolidated view of construction products that includes the tracking of tasks, management of project workflows, and scheduling.
CENX vs PCOR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $349.1M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-37.6M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | 80.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 7.6% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | -10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | 39.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $349.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | $349.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | $338.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $302.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $284.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-37.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | $-62.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $-6.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 80.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | 80.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 79.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 81.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 81.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 83.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | -9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | -21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | -5.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | -2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | $480.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $480.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | $768.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | $684.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $620.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | $566.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $775.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $756.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | $735.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | $113.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $113.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | $114.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $88.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | $66.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $29.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $39.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $58.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | $109.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $56.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 20.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
PCOR
Segment breakdown not available.
