vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. (SSD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CENTURY ALUMINUM CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($633.7M vs $588.0M, roughly 1.1× Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.). Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.0% vs 0.3%, a 14.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.1% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs -0.8%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
Simpson Manufacturing Company is a leading building materials manufacturer in the United States that produces structural connectors, fasteners, anchors, and products for new construction and retrofitting.
CENX vs SSD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $588.0M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $88.2M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 19.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 15.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | 13.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $2.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $588.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | $539.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | $623.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | $631.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $538.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $517.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | $587.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $597.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $88.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $56.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $107.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $103.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $77.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | $55.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $93.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $97.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 46.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 46.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 44.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 46.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 46.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 22.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 16.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 16.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.13 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $2.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $2.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $1.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $1.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $2.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $2.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | $341.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $341.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | $384.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | $297.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $190.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | $150.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $239.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $339.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | $354.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $300.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $371.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $376.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $382.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $388.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $393.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $399.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.23× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | $155.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $170.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $125.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $115.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $103.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $111.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | $119.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | $87.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | $-42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | $60.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $58.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $70.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | -7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 11.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 6.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | 0.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | 2.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
SSD
Segment breakdown not available.
