vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and WillScot Holdings Corp (WSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CENTURY ALUMINUM CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($633.7M vs $566.0M, roughly 1.1× WillScot Holdings Corp). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO runs the higher net margin — 0.3% vs -33.1%, a 33.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.4% vs -6.1%). WillScot Holdings Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($149.7M vs $67.7M). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
WillScot Holdings Corp is a leading provider of modular space solutions and portable storage services across North America. It serves a wide range of sectors including construction, commercial development, education, healthcare, government projects, and special events, offering flexible, scalable temporary and semi-permanent space solutions tailored to diverse client needs.
CENX vs WSC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $566.0M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-187.3M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | -32.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | -33.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | -6.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | -310.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | $566.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | $566.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | $589.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $559.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $602.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | $601.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $604.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $489.5M | $587.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $-187.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $43.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $43.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | $89.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $-70.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.8M | $56.2M |
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | 50.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 49.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 50.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 53.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 53.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 54.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 54.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | -32.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 21.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | -5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 22.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | -33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | -11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | -7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.4% | 9.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $-1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $0.48 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.26 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | $14.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $856.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $5.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | $10.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.5M | $13.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | $856.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $601.5M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $6.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $6.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.63× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | $158.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | $149.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | 26.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | $737.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | $158.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $191.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $205.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | $206.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $178.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $175.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.8M | $208.7M |
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | $149.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $186.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | $199.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | $202.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | $176.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $169.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.5M | $202.1M |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | 33.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 36.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | 29.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.1% | 34.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | 4.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | 4.80× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.06× | 3.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
WSC
| Modular Space Leasing | $249.8M | 44% |
| Value Added Product And Services | $101.0M | 18% |
| Portable Storage Leasing | $83.0M | 15% |
| Delivery Revenue | $48.2M | 9% |
| Installation Revenue | $45.0M | 8% |
| Rental Units | $19.7M | 3% |
| New Units | $15.5M | 3% |
| Value Added Services | $10.3M | 2% |
| Other Leasing Related Products And Services | $3.8M | 1% |
