vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CENTURY ALUMINUM CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($633.7M vs $490.7M, roughly 1.3× OLYMPIC STEEL INC). OLYMPIC STEEL INC runs the higher net margin — 0.4% vs 0.3%, a 0.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLYMPIC STEEL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.4% vs 0.4%). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($67.7M vs $-12.9M). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 0.1%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
CENX vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $526.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $489.5M | $526.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $246.8M | $8.7M |
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.4% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.26 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | $9.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.5M | $10.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $196.8M |
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | $569.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $601.5M | $563.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.8M | $-2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.5M | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.1% | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.06× | -0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |
