vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. (CETY) and SPIRE INC (SR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SPIRE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($762.2M vs $773.6K, roughly 985.3× Clean Energy Technologies, Inc.). SPIRE INC runs the higher net margin — 12.5% vs -271.8%, a 284.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (228.9% vs 13.9%). Over the past eight quarters, SPIRE INC's revenue compounded faster (-17.8% CAGR vs -26.1%).
Bloom Energy is an American public company that designs and manufactures solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) which independently produce electricity onsite for power generation in data centers, manufacturing, and other commercial sectors. Founded in 2001 and headquartered in San Jose, California; its fuel cell technology generates electricity through a chemical conversion process, which differs from most other power sources reliant on combustion, and can use natural gas, biogas or hydrogen as fuel...
Spire Inc. is a regional public utility holding company based in St. Louis, Missouri, providing natural gas service through its regulated core utility operations while engaging in non-regulated activities that provide business opportunities. Its primary subsidiary Laclede Gas Company is the largest natural gas distribution utility in Missouri, serving approximately 631,000 residential, commercial and industrial customers in the City of St. Louis and ten counties in eastern Missouri. Its corpo...
CETY vs SR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $773.6K | $762.2M |
| Net Profit | $-2.1M | $95.0M |
| Gross Margin | 23.7% | 55.1% |
| Operating Margin | -172.6% | 22.8% |
| Net Margin | -271.8% | 12.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 228.9% | 13.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -61.8% | 16.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.47 | $1.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $762.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $773.6K | $334.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $236.3K | $421.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $791.9K | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $480.3K | $669.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $235.2K | $293.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $196.1K | $414.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $95.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.1M | $-39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-331.2K | $209.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-865.6K | $81.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-831.9K | $-12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4M | $204.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 94.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 92.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.7% | 55.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 89.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -172.6% | -0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -311.0% | 16.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.1% | 29.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -116.3% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -322.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -496.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -54.3% | 26.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -271.8% | -11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -460.8% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -41.8% | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -180.2% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -552.5% | -8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -424.2% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -93.8% | 18.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.47 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $0.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | $3.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.40 | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.44 | $-0.63 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.02 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.04 | $3.58 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $234.9K | $4.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.1M | $3.4B |
| Total Assets | $14.8M | $11.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $234.9K | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $233.4K | $13.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.1K | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8M | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4M | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.8M | $11.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $11.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1M | $11.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.5M | $11.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.4M | $10.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3M | $10.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0M | $10.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.7M | $81.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-121.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -16.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 26.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-286.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $81.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.7M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-780.9K | $129.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-776.0K | $372.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-772.3K | $81.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.2M | $82.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-740.4K | $270.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-871.6K | $489.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-121.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-227.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-91.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $154.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-179.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-146.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $306.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -16.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -68.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -26.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -50.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 66.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.40× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CETY
Segment breakdown not available.
SR
| Residential | $474.9M | 62% |
| Commercial And Industrial | $148.4M | 19% |
| Gas Marketing | $41.1M | 5% |
| Midstream | $39.0M | 5% |
| Transportation | $37.1M | 5% |
| Offsystem And Other Inventive | $19.7M | 3% |
| Other Customer Revenue | $4.6M | 1% |
