vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of CF Industries (CF) and Compass, Inc. (COMP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

CF Industries is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.1× Compass, Inc.). CF Industries runs the higher net margin — 26.4% vs -2.5%, a 28.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Compass, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.1% vs 22.8%). CF Industries produced more free cash flow last quarter ($313.0M vs $42.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Compass, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.0% CAGR vs 12.8%).

CF Industries Holdings, Inc. is an American manufacturer and distributor of agricultural fertilizers, including ammonia, urea, and ammonium nitrate products. The company is based in Northbrook, Illinois, a suburb of Chicago, and was founded in 1946 as the Central Farmers Fertilizer Company. For its first 56 years, it was a federation of regional agricultural supply cooperatives. CF then demutualized, and became a publicly traded company.

Compass, Inc. operates a residential real estate brokerage in the United States. It has approximately 33,000 agents, who are generally independent contractors, on its platform. It operates under many brand names including Compass, Better Homes and Gardens Real Estate, Century 21 Real Estate, Coldwell Banker, Corcoran Group, Sotheby's International Realty, and Christie's International Real Estate.

CF vs COMP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CF
CF
1.1× larger
CF
$1.9B
$1.7B
COMP
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
COMP
COMP
+0.3% gap
COMP
23.1%
22.8%
CF
Higher net margin
CF
CF
28.9% more per $
CF
26.4%
-2.5%
COMP
More free cash flow
CF
CF
$270.8M more FCF
CF
$313.0M
$42.2M
COMP
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
COMP
COMP
Annualised
COMP
27.0%
12.8%
CF

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Revenue
$1.9B
$1.7B
Net Profit
$495.0M
$-42.6M
Gross Margin
40.9%
Operating Margin
33.0%
-2.5%
Net Margin
26.4%
-2.5%
Revenue YoY
22.8%
23.1%
Net Profit YoY
26.3%
-5.2%
EPS (diluted)
$2.56
$-0.07

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Q4 25
$1.9B
$1.7B
Q3 25
$1.7B
$1.8B
Q2 25
$1.9B
$2.1B
Q1 25
$1.7B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.5B
$1.4B
Q3 24
$1.4B
$1.5B
Q2 24
$1.6B
$1.7B
Q1 24
$1.5B
$1.1B
Net Profit
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Q4 25
$495.0M
$-42.6M
Q3 25
$460.0M
$-4.6M
Q2 25
$492.0M
$39.4M
Q1 25
$351.0M
$-50.7M
Q4 24
$392.0M
$-40.5M
Q3 24
$341.0M
$-1.7M
Q2 24
$506.0M
$20.7M
Q1 24
$238.0M
$-132.9M
Gross Margin
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Q4 25
40.9%
Q3 25
38.1%
Q2 25
39.9%
Q1 25
34.4%
Q4 24
34.4%
Q3 24
32.4%
Q2 24
43.2%
Q1 24
27.8%
Operating Margin
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Q4 25
33.0%
-2.5%
Q3 25
35.0%
-0.4%
Q2 25
34.3%
1.9%
Q1 25
27.4%
-4.0%
Q4 24
28.9%
-2.9%
Q3 24
26.6%
-0.2%
Q2 24
40.6%
1.3%
Q1 24
20.6%
-12.5%
Net Margin
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Q4 25
26.4%
-2.5%
Q3 25
27.7%
-0.2%
Q2 25
26.0%
1.9%
Q1 25
21.1%
-3.7%
Q4 24
25.7%
-2.9%
Q3 24
24.9%
-0.1%
Q2 24
32.2%
1.2%
Q1 24
16.2%
-12.6%
EPS (diluted)
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Q4 25
$2.56
$-0.07
Q3 25
$2.19
$-0.01
Q2 25
$2.37
$0.07
Q1 25
$1.85
$-0.09
Q4 24
$1.86
$-0.08
Q3 24
$1.55
$0.00
Q2 24
$2.30
$0.04
Q1 24
$1.03
$-0.27

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$199.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.2B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.8B
$782.0M
Total Assets
$14.1B
$1.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.66×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Q4 25
$199.0M
Q3 25
$170.3M
Q2 25
$177.3M
Q1 25
$127.0M
Q4 24
$223.8M
Q3 24
$211.2M
Q2 24
$185.8M
Q1 24
$165.9M
Total Debt
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Q4 25
$3.2B
Q3 25
$3.0B
Q2 25
$3.0B
Q1 25
$3.0B
Q4 24
$3.0B
Q3 24
$3.0B
Q2 24
$3.0B
Q1 24
$3.0B
Stockholders' Equity
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Q4 25
$4.8B
$782.0M
Q3 25
$4.8B
$773.3M
Q2 25
$5.0B
$719.9M
Q1 25
$4.8B
$635.0M
Q4 24
$5.0B
$409.4M
Q3 24
$5.2B
$428.0M
Q2 24
$5.5B
$398.4M
Q1 24
$5.4B
$330.3M
Total Assets
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Q4 25
$14.1B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$14.2B
$1.6B
Q2 25
$13.8B
$1.6B
Q1 25
$13.3B
$1.5B
Q4 24
$13.5B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$13.8B
$1.2B
Q2 24
$13.8B
$1.2B
Q1 24
$13.9B
$1.1B
Debt / Equity
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Q4 25
0.66×
Q3 25
0.61×
Q2 25
0.60×
Q1 25
0.62×
Q4 24
0.60×
Q3 24
0.57×
Q2 24
0.54×
Q1 24
0.55×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$539.0M
$45.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$313.0M
$42.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
16.7%
2.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
12.1%
0.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.09×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.8B
$203.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Q4 25
$539.0M
$45.3M
Q3 25
$1.1B
$75.5M
Q2 25
$563.0M
$72.8M
Q1 25
$586.0M
$23.1M
Q4 24
$420.0M
$30.5M
Q3 24
$931.0M
$37.4M
Q2 24
$475.0M
$45.0M
Q1 24
$445.0M
$8.6M
Free Cash Flow
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Q4 25
$313.0M
$42.2M
Q3 25
$717.0M
$73.6M
Q2 25
$318.0M
$68.0M
Q1 25
$454.0M
$19.5M
Q4 24
$223.0M
$26.7M
Q3 24
$792.0M
$32.8M
Q2 24
$391.0M
$40.4M
Q1 24
$347.0M
$5.9M
FCF Margin
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Q4 25
16.7%
2.5%
Q3 25
43.2%
4.0%
Q2 25
16.8%
3.3%
Q1 25
27.3%
1.4%
Q4 24
14.6%
1.9%
Q3 24
57.8%
2.2%
Q2 24
24.9%
2.4%
Q1 24
23.6%
0.6%
Capex Intensity
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Q4 25
12.1%
0.2%
Q3 25
20.9%
0.1%
Q2 25
13.0%
0.2%
Q1 25
7.9%
0.3%
Q4 24
12.9%
0.3%
Q3 24
10.1%
0.3%
Q2 24
5.3%
0.3%
Q1 24
6.7%
0.3%
Cash Conversion
CF
CF
COMP
COMP
Q4 25
1.09×
Q3 25
2.31×
Q2 25
1.14×
1.85×
Q1 25
1.67×
Q4 24
1.07×
Q3 24
2.73×
Q2 24
0.94×
2.17×
Q1 24
1.87×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CF
CF

Ammonia$591.0M32%
UAN$493.0M26%
Urea$372.0M20%
Other$244.0M13%
Other Products$147.0M8%
Ammonium Nitrate Segment$25.0M1%

COMP
COMP

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons