vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of CF Industries (CF) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

EQT Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.4B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.8× CF Industries). EQT Corporation runs the higher net margin — 44.0% vs 26.4%, a 17.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EQT Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (94.2% vs 22.8%). EQT Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.9B vs $313.0M). Over the past eight quarters, EQT Corporation's revenue compounded faster (94.9% CAGR vs 12.8%).

CF Industries Holdings, Inc. is an American manufacturer and distributor of agricultural fertilizers, including ammonia, urea, and ammonium nitrate products. The company is based in Northbrook, Illinois, a suburb of Chicago, and was founded in 1946 as the Central Farmers Fertilizer Company. For its first 56 years, it was a federation of regional agricultural supply cooperatives. CF then demutualized, and became a publicly traded company.

EQT Corporation is a leading independent natural gas exploration and production company headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S. It mainly operates in the Appalachian Basin, producing natural gas, natural gas liquids and crude oil to supply energy for residential, commercial, industrial and power generation needs across North American markets.

CF vs EQT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
EQT
EQT
1.8× larger
EQT
$3.4B
$1.9B
CF
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
EQT
EQT
+71.4% gap
EQT
94.2%
22.8%
CF
Higher net margin
EQT
EQT
17.6% more per $
EQT
44.0%
26.4%
CF
More free cash flow
EQT
EQT
$1.6B more FCF
EQT
$1.9B
$313.0M
CF
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
EQT
EQT
Annualised
EQT
94.9%
12.8%
CF

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Revenue
$1.9B
$3.4B
Net Profit
$495.0M
$1.5B
Gross Margin
40.9%
Operating Margin
33.0%
60.3%
Net Margin
26.4%
44.0%
Revenue YoY
22.8%
94.2%
Net Profit YoY
26.3%
514.5%
EPS (diluted)
$2.56
$2.36

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Q1 26
$3.4B
Q4 25
$1.9B
$2.4B
Q3 25
$1.7B
$2.0B
Q2 25
$1.9B
$2.6B
Q1 25
$1.7B
$1.7B
Q4 24
$1.5B
$1.6B
Q3 24
$1.4B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$1.6B
$889.5M
Net Profit
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Q1 26
$1.5B
Q4 25
$495.0M
$677.1M
Q3 25
$460.0M
$335.9M
Q2 25
$492.0M
$784.1M
Q1 25
$351.0M
$242.1M
Q4 24
$392.0M
$418.4M
Q3 24
$341.0M
$-300.8M
Q2 24
$506.0M
$9.5M
Gross Margin
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Q1 26
Q4 25
40.9%
83.8%
Q3 25
38.1%
80.7%
Q2 25
39.9%
84.8%
Q1 25
34.4%
78.3%
Q4 24
34.4%
76.2%
Q3 24
32.4%
65.7%
Q2 24
43.2%
38.9%
Operating Margin
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Q1 26
60.3%
Q4 25
33.0%
42.5%
Q3 25
35.0%
30.8%
Q2 25
34.3%
44.3%
Q1 25
27.4%
28.5%
Q4 24
28.9%
48.1%
Q3 24
26.6%
-22.0%
Q2 24
40.6%
0.3%
Net Margin
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Q1 26
44.0%
Q4 25
26.4%
28.4%
Q3 25
27.7%
17.1%
Q2 25
26.0%
30.7%
Q1 25
21.1%
13.9%
Q4 24
25.7%
25.8%
Q3 24
24.9%
-23.4%
Q2 24
32.2%
1.1%
EPS (diluted)
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Q1 26
$2.36
Q4 25
$2.56
$1.08
Q3 25
$2.19
$0.53
Q2 25
$2.37
$1.30
Q1 25
$1.85
$0.40
Q4 24
$1.86
$0.74
Q3 24
$1.55
$-0.54
Q2 24
$2.30
$0.02

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$326.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.2B
$507.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.8B
$28.8B
Total Assets
$14.1B
$41.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.66×
0.02×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Q1 26
$326.6M
Q4 25
$110.8M
Q3 25
$235.7M
Q2 25
$555.5M
Q1 25
$281.8M
Q4 24
$202.1M
Q3 24
$89.0M
Q2 24
$30.0M
Total Debt
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Q1 26
$507.5M
Q4 25
$3.2B
$7.8B
Q3 25
$3.0B
$8.2B
Q2 25
$3.0B
$8.3B
Q1 25
$3.0B
$8.4B
Q4 24
$3.0B
$9.3B
Q3 24
$3.0B
$13.8B
Q2 24
$3.0B
$5.0B
Stockholders' Equity
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Q1 26
$28.8B
Q4 25
$4.8B
$23.8B
Q3 25
$4.8B
$23.2B
Q2 25
$5.0B
$21.4B
Q1 25
$4.8B
$20.7B
Q4 24
$5.0B
$20.6B
Q3 24
$5.2B
$20.3B
Q2 24
$5.5B
$15.1B
Total Assets
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Q1 26
$41.7B
Q4 25
$14.1B
$41.8B
Q3 25
$14.2B
$41.2B
Q2 25
$13.8B
$39.7B
Q1 25
$13.3B
$39.7B
Q4 24
$13.5B
$39.8B
Q3 24
$13.8B
$39.9B
Q2 24
$13.8B
$24.7B
Debt / Equity
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Q1 26
0.02×
Q4 25
0.66×
0.33×
Q3 25
0.61×
0.35×
Q2 25
0.60×
0.39×
Q1 25
0.62×
0.41×
Q4 24
0.60×
0.45×
Q3 24
0.57×
0.68×
Q2 24
0.54×
0.33×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$539.0M
$3.1B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$313.0M
$1.9B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
16.7%
57.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
12.1%
18.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.09×
2.05×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.8B
$3.5B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Q1 26
$3.1B
Q4 25
$539.0M
$1.1B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$1.0B
Q2 25
$563.0M
$1.2B
Q1 25
$586.0M
$1.7B
Q4 24
$420.0M
$756.3M
Q3 24
$931.0M
$593.0M
Q2 24
$475.0M
$322.0M
Free Cash Flow
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Q1 26
$1.9B
Q4 25
$313.0M
$512.7M
Q3 25
$717.0M
$391.3M
Q2 25
$318.0M
$692.1M
Q1 25
$454.0M
$1.2B
Q4 24
$223.0M
$164.7M
Q3 24
$792.0M
$23.5M
Q2 24
$391.0M
$-236.1M
FCF Margin
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Q1 26
57.6%
Q4 25
16.7%
21.5%
Q3 25
43.2%
20.0%
Q2 25
16.8%
27.1%
Q1 25
27.3%
71.4%
Q4 24
14.6%
10.1%
Q3 24
57.8%
1.8%
Q2 24
24.9%
-26.5%
Capex Intensity
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Q1 26
18.0%
Q4 25
12.1%
25.7%
Q3 25
20.9%
32.0%
Q2 25
13.0%
21.5%
Q1 25
7.9%
28.7%
Q4 24
12.9%
36.4%
Q3 24
10.1%
44.4%
Q2 24
5.3%
62.7%
Cash Conversion
CF
CF
EQT
EQT
Q1 26
2.05×
Q4 25
1.09×
1.66×
Q3 25
2.31×
3.03×
Q2 25
1.14×
1.58×
Q1 25
1.67×
7.19×
Q4 24
1.07×
1.81×
Q3 24
2.73×
Q2 24
0.94×
33.84×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CF
CF

Ammonia$591.0M32%
UAN$493.0M26%
Urea$372.0M20%
Other$244.0M13%
Other Products$147.0M8%
Ammonium Nitrate Segment$25.0M1%

EQT
EQT

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons