vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of CF Industries (CF) and Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Toll Brothers, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.4B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.8× CF Industries). CF Industries runs the higher net margin — 26.4% vs 13.0%, a 13.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CF Industries posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.8% vs 2.7%). Toll Brothers, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($772.2M vs $313.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Toll Brothers, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (32.6% CAGR vs 12.8%).

CF Industries Holdings, Inc. is an American manufacturer and distributor of agricultural fertilizers, including ammonia, urea, and ammonium nitrate products. The company is based in Northbrook, Illinois, a suburb of Chicago, and was founded in 1946 as the Central Farmers Fertilizer Company. For its first 56 years, it was a federation of regional agricultural supply cooperatives. CF then demutualized, and became a publicly traded company.

Toll Brothers, Inc. is an American homebuilding company that builds, markets, and finances for residential and commercial properties in the United States. In 2020, the company was the fifth largest home builder in the United States, based on homebuilding revenue. The company is ranked 411th on the Fortune 500.

CF vs TOL — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TOL
TOL
1.8× larger
TOL
$3.4B
$1.9B
CF
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
CF
CF
+20.1% gap
CF
22.8%
2.7%
TOL
Higher net margin
CF
CF
13.4% more per $
CF
26.4%
13.0%
TOL
More free cash flow
TOL
TOL
$459.2M more FCF
TOL
$772.2M
$313.0M
CF
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TOL
TOL
Annualised
TOL
32.6%
12.8%
CF

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Revenue
$1.9B
$3.4B
Net Profit
$495.0M
$446.7M
Gross Margin
40.9%
24.8%
Operating Margin
33.0%
16.5%
Net Margin
26.4%
13.0%
Revenue YoY
22.8%
2.7%
Net Profit YoY
26.3%
-6.0%
EPS (diluted)
$2.56
$4.51

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Q4 25
$1.9B
$3.4B
Q3 25
$1.7B
$2.9B
Q2 25
$1.9B
$2.7B
Q1 25
$1.7B
$1.9B
Q4 24
$1.5B
$3.3B
Q3 24
$1.4B
$2.7B
Q2 24
$1.6B
$2.8B
Q1 24
$1.5B
$1.9B
Net Profit
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Q4 25
$495.0M
$446.7M
Q3 25
$460.0M
$369.6M
Q2 25
$492.0M
$352.4M
Q1 25
$351.0M
$177.7M
Q4 24
$392.0M
$475.4M
Q3 24
$341.0M
$374.6M
Q2 24
$506.0M
$481.6M
Q1 24
$238.0M
$239.6M
Gross Margin
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Q4 25
40.9%
24.8%
Q3 25
38.1%
25.2%
Q2 25
39.9%
25.8%
Q1 25
34.4%
24.7%
Q4 24
34.4%
26.4%
Q3 24
32.4%
27.2%
Q2 24
43.2%
30.4%
Q1 24
27.8%
27.6%
Operating Margin
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Q4 25
33.0%
16.5%
Q3 25
35.0%
16.6%
Q2 25
34.3%
16.4%
Q1 25
27.4%
11.8%
Q4 24
28.9%
18.3%
Q3 24
26.6%
18.2%
Q2 24
40.6%
22.0%
Q1 24
20.6%
15.8%
Net Margin
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Q4 25
26.4%
13.0%
Q3 25
27.7%
12.6%
Q2 25
26.0%
12.9%
Q1 25
21.1%
9.6%
Q4 24
25.7%
14.3%
Q3 24
24.9%
13.7%
Q2 24
32.2%
17.0%
Q1 24
16.2%
12.3%
EPS (diluted)
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Q4 25
$2.56
$4.51
Q3 25
$2.19
$3.73
Q2 25
$2.37
$3.50
Q1 25
$1.85
$1.75
Q4 24
$1.86
$4.61
Q3 24
$1.55
$3.60
Q2 24
$2.30
$4.55
Q1 24
$1.03
$2.25

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.3B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$3.2B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.8B
$8.3B
Total Assets
$14.1B
$14.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.66×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Q4 25
$1.3B
Q3 25
$852.3M
Q2 25
$686.5M
Q1 25
$574.8M
Q4 24
$1.3B
Q3 24
$893.4M
Q2 24
$1.0B
Q1 24
$754.8M
Total Debt
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Q4 25
$3.2B
Q3 25
$3.0B
Q2 25
$3.0B
Q1 25
$3.0B
Q4 24
$3.0B
Q3 24
$3.0B
Q2 24
$3.0B
Q1 24
$3.0B
Stockholders' Equity
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Q4 25
$4.8B
$8.3B
Q3 25
$4.8B
$8.1B
Q2 25
$5.0B
$7.9B
Q1 25
$4.8B
$7.8B
Q4 24
$5.0B
$7.7B
Q3 24
$5.2B
$7.4B
Q2 24
$5.5B
$7.3B
Q1 24
$5.4B
$7.0B
Total Assets
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Q4 25
$14.1B
$14.5B
Q3 25
$14.2B
$14.4B
Q2 25
$13.8B
$14.2B
Q1 25
$13.3B
$13.6B
Q4 24
$13.5B
$13.4B
Q3 24
$13.8B
$13.4B
Q2 24
$13.8B
$13.3B
Q1 24
$13.9B
$12.5B
Debt / Equity
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Q4 25
0.66×
Q3 25
0.61×
Q2 25
0.60×
Q1 25
0.62×
Q4 24
0.60×
Q3 24
0.57×
Q2 24
0.54×
Q1 24
0.55×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$539.0M
$800.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$313.0M
$772.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
16.7%
22.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
12.1%
0.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.09×
1.79×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.8B
$1.0B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Q4 25
$539.0M
$800.0M
Q3 25
$1.1B
$370.3M
Q2 25
$563.0M
$362.8M
Q1 25
$586.0M
$-420.8M
Q4 24
$420.0M
$682.5M
Q3 24
$931.0M
$175.6M
Q2 24
$475.0M
$459.0M
Q1 24
$445.0M
$-307.0M
Free Cash Flow
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Q4 25
$313.0M
$772.2M
Q3 25
$717.0M
$344.9M
Q2 25
$318.0M
$347.3M
Q1 25
$454.0M
$-438.1M
Q4 24
$223.0M
$664.3M
Q3 24
$792.0M
$149.9M
Q2 24
$391.0M
$442.9M
Q1 24
$347.0M
$-320.6M
FCF Margin
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Q4 25
16.7%
22.6%
Q3 25
43.2%
11.7%
Q2 25
16.8%
12.7%
Q1 25
27.3%
-23.6%
Q4 24
14.6%
19.9%
Q3 24
57.8%
5.5%
Q2 24
24.9%
15.6%
Q1 24
23.6%
-16.5%
Capex Intensity
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Q4 25
12.1%
0.8%
Q3 25
20.9%
0.9%
Q2 25
13.0%
0.6%
Q1 25
7.9%
0.9%
Q4 24
12.9%
0.5%
Q3 24
10.1%
0.9%
Q2 24
5.3%
0.6%
Q1 24
6.7%
0.7%
Cash Conversion
CF
CF
TOL
TOL
Q4 25
1.09×
1.79×
Q3 25
2.31×
1.00×
Q2 25
1.14×
1.03×
Q1 25
1.67×
-2.37×
Q4 24
1.07×
1.44×
Q3 24
2.73×
0.47×
Q2 24
0.94×
0.95×
Q1 24
1.87×
-1.28×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CF
CF

Ammonia$591.0M32%
UAN$493.0M26%
Urea$372.0M20%
Other$244.0M13%
Other Products$147.0M8%
Ammonium Nitrate Segment$25.0M1%

TOL
TOL

Home Building$3.4B100%
Land$9.4M0%

Related Comparisons