vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CF Industries (CF) and VIASAT INC (VSAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CF Industries is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.6× VIASAT INC). CF Industries runs the higher net margin — 26.4% vs 2.2%, a 24.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CF Industries posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.8% vs 3.0%). Over the past eight quarters, CF Industries's revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 0.3%).
CF Industries Holdings, Inc. is an American manufacturer and distributor of agricultural fertilizers, including ammonia, urea, and ammonium nitrate products. The company is based in Northbrook, Illinois, a suburb of Chicago, and was founded in 1946 as the Central Farmers Fertilizer Company. For its first 56 years, it was a federation of regional agricultural supply cooperatives. CF then demutualized, and became a publicly traded company.
Viasat, Inc. is an American communications company based in Carlsbad, California, with additional operations across the United States and worldwide. Viasat is a provider of high-speed satellite broadband services and secure networking systems covering military and commercial markets.
CF vs VSAT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $495.0M | $25.0M |
| Gross Margin | 40.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 33.0% | 2.3% |
| Net Margin | 26.4% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 22.8% | 3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.3% | 115.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.56 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $495.0M | $25.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $460.0M | $-61.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $492.0M | $-56.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.0M | $-246.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $392.0M | $-158.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $341.0M | $-137.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $506.0M | $-32.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $238.0M | $-100.3M |
| Q4 25 | 40.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 33.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.4% | -13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.6% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.6% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.7% | -5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.1% | -21.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.7% | -14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | -2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.2% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $2.56 | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.19 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.37 | $-0.43 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.85 | $-1.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.86 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.55 | $-1.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.30 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.03 | $-1.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $6.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | $4.6B |
| Total Assets | $14.1B | $14.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.66× | 1.37× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $6.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $6.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0B | $7.1B |
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $5.0B |
| Q4 25 | $14.1B | $14.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2B | $14.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8B | $14.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | $15.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5B | $15.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8B | $17.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.8B | $16.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.9B | $16.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.66× | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.61× | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.60× | 1.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.62× | 1.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.60× | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.57× | 1.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.54× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.55× | 1.42× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $539.0M | $726.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $313.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.09× | 29.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.8B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $539.0M | $726.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $282.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $563.0M | $258.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $586.0M | $298.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $420.0M | $219.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $931.0M | $239.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $475.0M | $151.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $445.0M | $232.0M |
| Q4 25 | $313.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $717.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $318.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $454.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $223.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $792.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $391.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $347.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | 29.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.87× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CF
| Ammonia | $591.0M | 32% |
| UAN | $493.0M | 26% |
| Urea | $372.0M | 20% |
| Other | $244.0M | 13% |
| Other Products | $147.0M | 8% |
| Ammonium Nitrate Segment | $25.0M | 1% |
VSAT
| Products | $334.2M | 29% |
| Aviation Services | $303.7M | 26% |
| Government Satcom Services | $202.4M | 17% |
| Maritime Services | $114.9M | 10% |
| Information Security And Cyber Defense Products | $97.0M | 8% |
| Tactical Networking Products | $93.9M | 8% |
| Navarino Uk And Jsat Mobile | $15.5M | 1% |
| Advanced Technologies And Other Products | $6.1M | 1% |
