vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CF BANKSHARES INC. (CFBK) and TRINITY BIOTECH PLC (TRIB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRINITY BIOTECH PLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.5M vs $15.7M, roughly 1.9× CF BANKSHARES INC.). CF BANKSHARES INC. runs the higher net margin — 40.0% vs -33.0%, a 73.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. CF BANKSHARES INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($18.2M vs $-4.1M).
CF Bankshares Inc. is a U.S.-based regional bank holding company operating through its community bank subsidiary. It offers a full suite of personal and commercial banking solutions including deposit products, various loan options, wealth management services and digital banking tools, primarily serving individual consumers and small-to-medium business clients across the U.S. Midwest region.
Trinity Biotech PLC develops, manufactures and markets diagnostic test kits and systems for clinical laboratories and point-of-care settings. Its product portfolio covers diabetes management, infectious diseases, cardiac health, autoimmune disorders and coagulation, with core markets across North America, Europe and emerging economies.
CFBK vs TRIB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.7M | $30.5M |
| Net Profit | $5.7M | $-10.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | 43.4% | -23.2% |
| Net Margin | 40.0% | -33.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 29.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.88 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $15.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $30.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 43.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | -23.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 40.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.5% | -33.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.88 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.36 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.68 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.68 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.65 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.47 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $259.0M | $5.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $184.4M | $-29.4M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $94.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $259.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $272.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $275.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $241.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $235.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $233.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $241.8M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $236.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $184.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $179.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $168.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.6M | $-29.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $158.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $94.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.7M | $-3.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $18.2M | $-4.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 115.6% | -13.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.1% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.26× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $33.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 115.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 50.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 99.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.6% | -13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.26× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.58× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.21× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.30× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.35× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.38× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
