vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CULLEN/FROST BANKERS, INC. (CFR) and Evolent Health, Inc. (EVH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CULLEN/FROST BANKERS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($580.9M vs $496.2M, roughly 1.2× Evolent Health, Inc.). CULLEN/FROST BANKERS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 28.6% vs -5.4%, a 34.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CULLEN/FROST BANKERS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.3% vs 2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, CULLEN/FROST BANKERS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (7.6% CAGR vs -12.4%).
Frost Bank is an American bank based in San Antonio that is chartered in Texas, with 200 branches and 1,750 automated teller machines in the state. It is the primary subsidiary of Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc., a bank holding company. It is one of the 60 largest banks of the country by total assets.
Magellan Health Inc., is an American for-profit managed health care company and subsidiary of Centene that focuses on special populations and other specialty areas of healthcare. Magellan's customers include health plans and other managed care organizations, employers, labor unions, various military and governmental agencies and third-party administrators. It ranked 390 on the Fortune 500 in 2021.
CFR vs EVH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $580.9M | $496.2M |
| Net Profit | $166.3M | $-26.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 16.9% |
| Operating Margin | 34.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 28.6% | -5.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.3% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.56 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $496.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $580.9M | $468.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $567.3M | $479.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $546.9M | $444.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $540.2M | $483.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $536.3M | $646.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $518.0M | $621.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $507.9M | $647.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-26.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $166.3M | $-429.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $174.4M | $-20.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.0M | $-19.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.9M | $-64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $154.9M | $-22.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $146.5M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.5M | $1.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | -87.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.2% | -0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.8% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.5% | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.6% | -91.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.7% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | -4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.9% | -13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.3% | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.6% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.56 | $-3.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.67 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.39 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.30 | $-0.63 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.36 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.24 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.21 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $142.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.6B | $396.4M |
| Total Assets | $53.0B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $151.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $116.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $151.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $246.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $104.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $96.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $101.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $396.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | $415.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5B | $842.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $896.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $935.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $53.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.8B | $2.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $274.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $127.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 21.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.65× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $116.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $274.0M | $48.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $248.6M | $15.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.8M | $-30.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-296.1M | $4.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $989.5M | $-26.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $307.2M | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $129.6M | $21.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $211.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-337.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $861.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $281.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $103.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -62.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 160.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.65× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.39× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.10× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.89× | 13.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CFR
Segment breakdown not available.
EVH
| Performance Suite | $323.3M | 65% |
| Specialty Technology and Services Suite | $80.8M | 16% |
| Administrative Services | $49.6M | 10% |
| Cases | $42.6M | 9% |
