vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) and BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC (EAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Carlyle Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.3× BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC). Carlyle Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 18.8% vs 8.7%, a 10.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Carlyle Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (84.1% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Carlyle Group Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (66.2% CAGR vs 10.3%).

The Carlyle Group Inc. is an American multinational company with operations in private equity, alternative asset management and financial services. As of 2023, the company had $426 billion of assets under management.

Brinker International, Inc. is an American multinational hospitality industry company that owns Chili's and Maggiano's Little Italy restaurant chains. Founded in 1975 and based in Dallas, Texas, Brinker currently owns, operates, or franchises 1,672 restaurants under the names Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy worldwide.

CG vs EAT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CG
CG
1.3× larger
CG
$1.9B
$1.5B
EAT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
CG
CG
+81.0% gap
CG
84.1%
3.2%
EAT
Higher net margin
CG
CG
10.1% more per $
CG
18.8%
8.7%
EAT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
CG
CG
Annualised
CG
66.2%
10.3%
EAT

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
CG
CG
EAT
EAT
Revenue
$1.9B
$1.5B
Net Profit
$358.1M
$127.9M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
24.3%
11.3%
Net Margin
18.8%
8.7%
Revenue YoY
84.1%
3.2%
Net Profit YoY
69.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.96
$2.87

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CG
CG
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$1.5B
Q4 25
$1.9B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$332.7M
$1.3B
Q2 25
$1.6B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$973.1M
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.0B
$1.4B
Q3 24
$2.6B
$1.1B
Q2 24
$1.1B
$1.2B
Net Profit
CG
CG
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$127.9M
Q4 25
$358.1M
$128.5M
Q3 25
$900.0K
$99.5M
Q2 25
$319.7M
$107.0M
Q1 25
$130.0M
$119.1M
Q4 24
$210.9M
$118.5M
Q3 24
$595.7M
$38.5M
Q2 24
$148.2M
$57.3M
Operating Margin
CG
CG
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
11.3%
Q4 25
24.3%
11.6%
Q3 25
25.8%
8.7%
Q2 25
28.0%
9.8%
Q1 25
17.6%
11.0%
Q4 24
25.7%
11.5%
Q3 24
29.9%
5.0%
Q2 24
20.5%
6.1%
Net Margin
CG
CG
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
8.7%
Q4 25
18.8%
8.8%
Q3 25
0.3%
7.4%
Q2 25
20.3%
7.3%
Q1 25
13.4%
8.4%
Q4 24
20.4%
8.7%
Q3 24
22.6%
3.4%
Q2 24
13.9%
4.7%
EPS (diluted)
CG
CG
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$2.87
Q4 25
$0.96
$2.86
Q3 25
$0.00
$2.17
Q2 25
$0.87
$2.31
Q1 25
$0.35
$2.56
Q4 24
$0.56
$2.61
Q3 24
$1.63
$0.84
Q2 24
$0.40
$1.22

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CG
CG
EAT
EAT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$2.0B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$424.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$7.1B
$406.0M
Total Assets
$29.1B
$2.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.05×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CG
CG
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$2.0B
$15.0M
Q3 25
$2.2B
$33.6M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$18.9M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$17.5M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$14.8M
Q3 24
$1.4B
$16.2M
Q2 24
$914.8M
$64.6M
Total Debt
CG
CG
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$424.4M
Q4 25
$451.3M
Q3 25
$525.8M
Q2 25
$426.0M
Q1 25
$518.3M
Q4 24
$652.0M
Q3 24
$806.9M
Q2 24
$786.3M
Stockholders' Equity
CG
CG
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$406.0M
Q4 25
$7.1B
$379.3M
Q3 25
$6.8B
$343.9M
Q2 25
$6.7B
$370.9M
Q1 25
$6.4B
$259.0M
Q4 24
$6.3B
$131.5M
Q3 24
$6.3B
$12.7M
Q2 24
$5.7B
$39.4M
Total Assets
CG
CG
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$2.8B
Q4 25
$29.1B
$2.7B
Q3 25
$27.1B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$25.1B
$2.7B
Q1 25
$24.1B
$2.6B
Q4 24
$23.1B
$2.6B
Q3 24
$22.7B
$2.5B
Q2 24
$22.3B
$2.6B
Debt / Equity
CG
CG
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
1.05×
Q4 25
1.19×
Q3 25
1.53×
Q2 25
1.15×
Q1 25
2.00×
Q4 24
4.96×
Q3 24
63.54×
Q2 24
19.96×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CG
CG
EAT
EAT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-1.2B
$571.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-1.2B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-65.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-3.34×
4.47×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-3.4B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CG
CG
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$571.8M
Q4 25
$-1.2B
$218.9M
Q3 25
$-1.6B
$120.8M
Q2 25
$-168.8M
$186.0M
Q1 25
$-352.1M
$212.0M
Q4 24
$-352.8M
$218.2M
Q3 24
$791.9M
$62.8M
Q2 24
$-1.3B
$141.5M
Free Cash Flow
CG
CG
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-1.2B
$155.2M
Q3 25
$-1.6B
$62.2M
Q2 25
$-186.3M
$106.1M
Q1 25
$-368.8M
$132.4M
Q4 24
$-379.5M
$168.9M
Q3 24
$772.8M
$6.3M
Q2 24
$-1.3B
$83.5M
FCF Margin
CG
CG
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
-65.1%
10.7%
Q3 25
-475.7%
4.6%
Q2 25
-11.8%
7.3%
Q1 25
-37.9%
9.3%
Q4 24
-36.8%
12.4%
Q3 24
29.3%
0.6%
Q2 24
-120.4%
6.9%
Capex Intensity
CG
CG
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.2%
4.4%
Q3 25
7.0%
4.3%
Q2 25
1.1%
5.5%
Q1 25
1.7%
5.6%
Q4 24
2.6%
3.6%
Q3 24
0.7%
5.0%
Q2 24
1.7%
4.8%
Cash Conversion
CG
CG
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
4.47×
Q4 25
-3.34×
1.70×
Q3 25
-1732.78×
1.21×
Q2 25
-0.53×
1.74×
Q1 25
-2.71×
1.78×
Q4 24
-1.67×
1.84×
Q3 24
1.33×
1.63×
Q2 24
-8.57×
2.47×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CG
CG

Fund Management Fee$606.8M32%
Other$528.7M28%
Global Private Equity Segment$307.3M16%
Global Credit Segment$238.0M13%
Carlyle Alp Invest Segment$124.6M7%
Incentive Fee$55.4M3%
Fee Related Performance Revenues$29.2M2%
Investment Advice$11.1M1%

EAT
EAT

Company sales$1.5B99%
Franchise revenues$14.7M1%

Related Comparisons