vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Canopy Growth Corp (CGC) and Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Canopy Growth Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($54.4M vs $46.9M, roughly 1.2× Caledonia Mining Corp Plc). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -84.0%, a 91.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs -0.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Canopy Growth Corporation, formerly Tweed Marijuana Inc., is a cannabis company based in Smiths Falls, Ontario.
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
CGC vs CMCL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $54.4M | $46.9M |
| Net Profit | $-45.7M | $3.3M |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | -35.3% | 18.6% |
| Net Margin | -84.0% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.3% | 13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 48.6% | -33.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $54.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.0M | $46.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.3M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.1M | $38.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-45.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-89.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-93.7M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-92.8M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1M |
| Q4 25 | 28.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.7% | 41.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.8% | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.3% | 35.9% |
| Q4 25 | -35.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -31.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -72.9% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -44.0% | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | -84.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -57.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -163.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -203.7% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -192.0% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $271.1M | $7.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $553.5M | $231.0M |
| Total Assets | $807.5M | $339.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $271.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $217.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.8M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.3M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $148.5M | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | $553.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $537.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $357.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $355.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $431.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $372.1M | $231.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $389.0M | $231.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $365.3M | $220.3M |
| Q4 25 | $807.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $781.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $660.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $669.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $849.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $899.6M | $339.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $938.9M | $338.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $949.2M | $321.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $4.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-121.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.8M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-205.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-128.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-40.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-208.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -271.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -84.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -392.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CGC
| Other | $24.0M | 44% |
| Canadian Adult Use Cannabis | $22.9M | 42% |
| International Markets Cannabis | $6.2M | 11% |
| Other Geographical Area | $1.2M | 2% |
CMCL
Segment breakdown not available.
