vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMPUGEN LTD (CGEN) and Knightscope, Inc. (KSCP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COMPUGEN LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.5M vs $2.5M, roughly 1.4× Knightscope, Inc.). COMPUGEN LTD runs the higher net margin — -410.1% vs -435.4%, a 25.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Knightscope, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-9.8% vs -61.8%).
Compugen Ltd. is a clinical-stage publicly traded predictive drug discovery and development company headquartered in Israel, with shares traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Compugen was established as computational drug discovery service provider in 1993. Compugen originally acted as service provider for pharma companies, supplying its software and computational services to predict different types of biological phenomena. It had arrangements with big compan...
Knightscope, Inc.KSCPEarnings & Financial Report
Knightscope, Inc. is an American security camera and robotics company headquartered in Mountain View, California. Knightscope designs, builds and deploys robots called Autonomous Data Robots (ADRs) for use in monitoring people in malls, parking lots, neighborhoods and other public areas. Knightscope robots are fully autonomous using self-driving technology and are designed to alert police and security of incidents through sensors that detect weapons, read license plates and detect other suspi...
CGEN vs KSCP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.5M | $2.5M |
| Net Profit | $-14.5M | $-11.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | -63.8% |
| Operating Margin | -475.1% | -444.7% |
| Net Margin | -410.1% | -435.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -61.8% | -9.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -54.7% | -58.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.16 | $-0.84 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.5M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.4M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.3M | $-7.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -63.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -50.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -33.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -22.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.5% | -17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.9% | -64.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -444.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -303.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -475.1% | -228.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -234.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -245.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -305.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -128.5% | -211.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -367.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -435.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -304.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -410.1% | -230.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -236.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -247.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -430.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -101.4% | -195.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 284.0% | -336.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.84 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.98 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.72 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.10 | $-2.68 | ||
| Q1 24 | $89505618.00 | $-3.99 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $35.3M | $20.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $50.3M | $27.8M |
| Total Assets | $106.5M | $41.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.14× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.3M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.6M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.3M | $2.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $27.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $26.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.3M | $15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.3M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $65.6M | $-26.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $41.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $41.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.5M | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $29.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $28.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $24.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.2M | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.3M | $24.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.6M | $-10.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -530.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-10.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.6M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.7M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -258.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -530.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -187.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 428.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CGEN
Segment breakdown not available.
KSCP
| Emergency Communication Devices | $1.5M | 60% |
| Other | $1.0M | 40% |
