vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMPUGEN LTD (CGEN) and Texas Community Bancshares, Inc. (TCBS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Texas Community Bancshares, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.4M vs $3.5M, roughly 1.3× COMPUGEN LTD). Texas Community Bancshares, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 18.9% vs -410.1%, a 429.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Texas Community Bancshares, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.8% vs -61.8%). Texas Community Bancshares, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($973.0K vs $-18.8M).
Compugen Ltd. is a clinical-stage publicly traded predictive drug discovery and development company headquartered in Israel, with shares traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Compugen was established as computational drug discovery service provider in 1993. Compugen originally acted as service provider for pharma companies, supplying its software and computational services to predict different types of biological phenomena. It had arrangements with big compan...
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated is an American bank holding company headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. Its banking subsidiary, The Huntington National Bank, operates 1,047 banking offices, primarily in the Midwest: 459 in Ohio, 290 in Michigan, 80 in Minnesota, 51 in Pennsylvania, 45 in Indiana, 35 in Illinois, 32 in Colorado, 29 in West Virginia, 16 in Wisconsin, 10 in Kentucky, and one in North Carolina.
CGEN vs TCBS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.5M | $4.4M |
| Net Profit | $-14.5M | $841.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -475.1% | 23.1% |
| Net Margin | -410.1% | 18.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -61.8% | 10.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -54.7% | 62.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.16 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $841.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $680.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.5M | $678.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $643.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $517.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $515.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.4M | $348.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.3M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -475.1% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -128.5% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -114.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -410.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -101.4% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 284.0% | -90.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $0.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.10 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $89505618.00 | $-0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $35.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $50.3M | $53.8M |
| Total Assets | $106.5M | $429.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $53.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $53.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.3M | $52.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $52.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $52.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $52.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.3M | $51.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $65.6M | $51.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $429.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $439.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.5M | $444.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $442.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $443.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $446.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.2M | $451.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.3M | $463.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.6M | $1.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.8M | $973.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -530.8% | 21.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.5% | 8.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.63× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.6M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $816.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.7M | $404.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $641.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $973.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.8M | $822.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $740.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $805.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.7M | $209.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-345.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -530.8% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -41.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 428.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
