vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CITY HOLDING CO (CHCO) and MITEK SYSTEMS INC (MITK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CITY HOLDING CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($80.2M vs $44.2M, roughly 1.8× MITEK SYSTEMS INC). CITY HOLDING CO runs the higher net margin — 39.4% vs 6.3%, a 33.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MITEK SYSTEMS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.8% vs 11.8%). CITY HOLDING CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($128.4M vs $6.6M). Over the past eight quarters, CITY HOLDING CO's revenue compounded faster (5.3% CAGR vs -2.9%).
Jam City, Inc. is an American video game developer and publisher based in Culver City, California. The company was founded in 2010 by Chris DeWolfe, Colin Digiaro, Aber Whitcomb, and Josh Yguado. Jam City has nine studios located in the United States, Canada, South America, and Europe. As of 2021, it employs 825 people. Netmarble is the largest shareholder in Jam City. As of 2021, Jam City's games have 31 million monthly active users and 1.3 billion total downloads.
Mitek Systems, Inc. is a software company that specializes in digital identity verification and mobile image processing using artificial intelligence. The company's software is used for depositing checks and opening bank accounts via mobile devices. It also verifies identity documents such as passports, ID cards, and driver's licenses by analyzing a selfie of an individual holding their ID, comparing their face to the photo on the document.
CHCO vs MITK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.2M | $44.2M |
| Net Profit | $31.6M | $2.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 49.3% | 12.3% |
| Net Margin | 39.4% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.8% | 18.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.2% | 160.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.17 | $0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $80.2M | $44.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.3M | $44.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.2M | $45.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.6M | $51.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.7M | $37.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.0M | $43.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.5M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $72.4M | $47.0M |
| Q4 25 | $31.6M | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.2M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.4M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.3M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.7M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.1M | $216.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.5M | $282.0K |
| Q4 25 | 49.3% | 12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 54.0% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.5% | 21.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.1% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.9% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.6% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 39.4% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.7% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.7% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.0% | -12.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.2% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.8% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | $2.17 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.41 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.29 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.06 | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.94 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.02 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.96 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.97 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $191.9M | $190.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $150.0M | $4.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $809.7M | $233.7M |
| Total Assets | $6.7B | $446.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.19× | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $191.9M | $190.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.6M | $193.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.1M | $167.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $384.7M | $136.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $225.4M | $121.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $293.9M | $130.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $218.0M | $123.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $318.7M | $123.9M |
| Q4 25 | $150.0M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $150.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $150.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $809.7M | $233.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $798.9M | $240.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $764.2M | $237.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $756.3M | $220.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.7M | $200.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $741.3M | $214.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $686.7M | $209.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $682.2M | $216.1M |
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $446.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7B | $459.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | $446.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6B | $425.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $396.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4B | $413.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3B | $409.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3B | $417.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.19× | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.19× | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.20× | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.22× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $131.4M | $8.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $128.4M | $6.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 160.2% | 14.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.16× | 2.89× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $223.3M | $60.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $131.4M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.3M | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.5M | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $131.9M | $565.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.6M | $21.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.3M | $13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.2M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $128.4M | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8M | $19.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $21.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.3M | $13.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.2M | $230.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.0M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.8M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.6M | $6.6M |
| Q4 25 | 160.2% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.0% | 42.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.6% | 46.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | 26.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 180.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.7% | 48.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.8% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.6% | 14.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.16× | 2.89× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.06× | 10.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.85× | 9.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | 1.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.60× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.26× | 2.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.97× | 60.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.09× | 25.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CHCO
Segment breakdown not available.
MITK
| Fraud And Identity Solutions | $25.5M | 58% |
| License | $13.9M | 31% |
| Fraud And Identity Solutions Software License And Support | $3.9M | 9% |
| Professional Services And Other | $1.2M | 3% |
