vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CITY HOLDING CO (CHCO) and Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TARS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($151.7M vs $80.2M, roughly 1.9× CITY HOLDING CO). CITY HOLDING CO runs the higher net margin — 39.4% vs -5.5%, a 44.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (128.4% vs 11.8%). CITY HOLDING CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($128.4M vs $13.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (134.4% CAGR vs 5.3%).
Jam City, Inc. is an American video game developer and publisher based in Culver City, California. The company was founded in 2010 by Chris DeWolfe, Colin Digiaro, Aber Whitcomb, and Josh Yguado. Jam City has nine studios located in the United States, Canada, South America, and Europe. As of 2021, it employs 825 people. Netmarble is the largest shareholder in Jam City. As of 2021, Jam City's games have 31 million monthly active users and 1.3 billion total downloads.
Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a late-stage clinical biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing innovative therapeutic candidates for unmet medical needs in ophthalmology, dermatology, and other specialty care areas. It operates primarily in the United States, with lead product candidates targeting common, underdiagnosed conditions including demodex blepharitis and rosacea.
CHCO vs TARS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.2M | $151.7M |
| Net Profit | $31.6M | $-8.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 49.3% | -5.3% |
| Net Margin | 39.4% | -5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.8% | 128.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.2% | 63.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.17 | $-0.17 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $80.2M | $151.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.3M | $118.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.2M | $102.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.6M | $78.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.7M | $66.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.0M | $48.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.5M | $40.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $72.4M | $27.6M |
| Q4 25 | $31.6M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.2M | $-12.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.4M | $-20.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.3M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.7M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $-23.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.1M | $-33.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.5M | $-35.7M |
| Q4 25 | 49.3% | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 54.0% | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.7% | -21.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.5% | -33.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.1% | -36.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.9% | -52.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.3% | -81.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.6% | -136.5% |
| Q4 25 | 39.4% | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.3% | -10.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.7% | -19.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 40.7% | -32.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.0% | -34.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.2% | -48.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.6% | -81.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.8% | -129.4% |
| Q4 25 | $2.17 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.41 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.29 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.06 | $-0.64 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.94 | $-0.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.02 | $-0.61 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.96 | $-0.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.97 | $-1.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $191.9M | $417.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $150.0M | $72.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $809.7M | $343.4M |
| Total Assets | $6.7B | $562.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.19× | 0.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $191.9M | $417.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.6M | $401.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.1M | $381.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $384.7M | $407.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $225.4M | $291.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $293.9M | $317.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $218.0M | $323.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $318.7M | $298.5M |
| Q4 25 | $150.0M | $72.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.0M | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.0M | $72.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.0M | $72.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.0M | $71.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $150.0M | $71.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.0M | $71.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $150.0M | $29.9M |
| Q4 25 | $809.7M | $343.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $798.9M | $335.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $764.2M | $332.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $756.3M | $342.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.7M | $224.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $741.3M | $237.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $686.7M | $252.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $682.2M | $275.2M |
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $562.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7B | $534.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | $495.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6B | $500.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $377.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4B | $376.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3B | $376.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3B | $349.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.19× | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.19× | 0.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.20× | 0.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.20× | 0.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.21× | 0.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.20× | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.22× | 0.28× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.22× | 0.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $131.4M | $19.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $128.4M | $13.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 160.2% | 8.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.16× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $223.3M | $-22.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $131.4M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.3M | $18.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2M | $-29.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.5M | $-20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $131.9M | $-22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.6M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.3M | $-14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.2M | $-37.8M |
| Q4 25 | $128.4M | $13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8M | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.8M | $-30.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.3M | $-21.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.2M | $-22.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.0M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.8M | $-15.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.6M | $-38.0M |
| Q4 25 | 160.2% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.0% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.6% | -29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.9% | -27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 180.2% | -33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.7% | -18.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.8% | -37.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.6% | -137.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.16× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.60× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.97× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.09× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
