vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Church & Dwight (CHD) and Xylem Inc. (XYL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Xylem Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.3× Church & Dwight). Xylem Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8.9% vs 8.7%, a 0.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Church & Dwight posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.9% vs 2.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Church & Dwight's revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs -1.0%).
Church & Dwight Co., Inc., is an American consumer goods company focusing on personal care, household products, and specialty products. The company was founded in 1847 and is headquartered in Ewing, New Jersey. It is the parent company of well-known brands such as Arm & Hammer, Trojan, OxiClean, and First Response. In 2022, Church & Dwight reported annual revenue of $5.4 billion. The company's products and services include a wide range of consumer goods, including laundry detergent, air fresh...
Xylem is one of the two types of transport tissue in vascular plants, the other being phloem; both of these are part of the vascular bundle. The basic function of the xylem is to transport water upward from the roots to parts of the plants such as stems and leaves, but it also transports nutrients. The word xylem is derived from the Ancient Greek word ξύλον (xúlon), meaning "wood"; the best-known xylem tissue is wood, though it is found throughout a plant.
CHD vs XYL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $143.5M | $189.0M |
| Gross Margin | 45.8% | 37.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.2% | 11.5% |
| Net Margin | 8.7% | 8.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.9% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -24.2% | 13.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.60 | $0.79 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $189.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $143.5M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.2M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.0M | $226.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $220.1M | $169.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $189.2M | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-75.1M | $217.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $243.5M | $194.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 45.8% | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.1% | 38.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.0% | 38.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.0% | 37.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.7% | 38.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.2% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.1% | 37.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.2% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.2% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.3% | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.0% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.0% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 8.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.79 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.60 | $1.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.75 | $0.93 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.78 | $0.93 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.89 | $0.69 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.76 | $1.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.31 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.99 | $0.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $409.0M | $808.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.2B | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $11.0B |
| Total Assets | $8.9B | $17.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.55× | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $808.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $409.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $305.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $923.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $964.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $752.1M | $989.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $491.7M | $815.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $11.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $11.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $11.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $10.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | $10.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $10.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $17.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.9B | $17.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.1B | $17.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8B | $17.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0B | $16.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9B | $16.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7B | $16.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8B | $15.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.55× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.52× | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.48× | 0.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.51× | 0.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.51× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CHD
| Household Products | $645.3M | 39% |
| Personal Care Products | $625.9M | 38% |
| Consumer International | $299.8M | 18% |
| Specialty Products Division | $73.2M | 4% |
XYL
| Revenue from products | $1.8B | 83% |
| Revenue from services | $368.0M | 17% |