vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHEMED CORP (CHE) and CN ENERGY GROUP. INC. (CNEY), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHEMED CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($639.3M vs $5.0M, roughly 128.6× CN ENERGY GROUP. INC.). CHEMED CORP runs the higher net margin — 12.0% vs -0.4%, a 12.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
LG Chem Ltd., often referred to as LG Chemical, is the largest Korean chemical company and is headquartered in Seoul, South Korea. It was the 9th largest chemical company in the world by sales in 2021. It was first established as the Lucky Chemical Industrial Corporation, which manufactured cosmetics. It is now solely a business-to-business company.
EVE Energy Co., Ltd. is a Chinese battery manufacturing company founded by Liu Jincheng in 2001 that specializes in the manufacturing of lithium-ion batteries for energy storage systems and electric vehicles. Its headquarters are located in Huizhou, Guangdong, and it was first listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange's ChiNext subsidiary in 2009. It is considered to be a Tier-1 battery supplier, and is the third largest energy storage battery cell maker in the world as of 2023. According to a st...
CHE vs CNEY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $639.3M | $5.0M |
| Net Profit | $76.8M | $-18.0K |
| Gross Margin | 35.2% | 0.1% |
| Operating Margin | 15.7% | -0.4% |
| Net Margin | 12.0% | -0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 55.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -15.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $5.45 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $639.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $624.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $618.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $646.9M | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $411.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $391.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $354.0M | $22.7M |
| Q4 25 | $76.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.8M | $-18.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $65.0M | $-4.2M |
| Q4 25 | 35.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.8% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.6% | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | -19.2% |
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.4% | -18.4% |
| Q4 25 | $5.45 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.46 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.57 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.86 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.00 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.00 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.65 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.24 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $74.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $979.4M | $102.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $104.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $129.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $249.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $173.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $222.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $565.5K |
| Q4 25 | $979.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $102.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $102.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $104.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $118.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.01× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $133.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $117.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 18.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 2.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 1.74× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $325.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $133.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $138.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $84.5M | $-579.2K |
| Q4 25 | $117.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $72.4M | $-579.3K |
| Q4 25 | 18.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | -2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.74× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.30× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CHE
| Routine Home Care | $372.5M | 58% |
| Drain Cleaning | $61.2M | 10% |
| Plumbing | $45.6M | 7% |
| Water Restoration | $41.0M | 6% |
| Other | $38.6M | 6% |
| Inpatient Care | $32.9M | 5% |
| Continuous Care | $18.4M | 3% |
| Contractor Revenue | $16.7M | 3% |
| All Other Revenue Self Pay Respite Care Ect. | $6.0M | 1% |
| All Other | $4.8M | 1% |
| Franchise Fees | $1.5M | 0% |
CNEY
Segment breakdown not available.
