vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHEGG, INC (CHGG) and STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STRATASYS LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($137.0M vs $72.7M, roughly 1.9× CHEGG, INC). On growth, STRATASYS LTD. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.2% vs -49.4%). STRATASYS LTD. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.5M vs $-15.5M). Over the past eight quarters, STRATASYS LTD.'s revenue compounded faster (-7.4% CAGR vs -35.4%).
Chegg, Inc., is an American educational technology company based in Santa Clara, California. It provides homework help, digital and physical textbook rentals, textbooks, online tutoring, and other student services, powered by artificial intelligence. The company has 6.6 million subscribers. Chegg has been widely criticized for facilitating cheating and academic dishonesty among students.
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
CHGG vs SSYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $72.7M | $137.0M |
| Net Profit | — | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | 57.3% | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | -47.2% | -16.6% |
| Net Margin | — | -40.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -49.4% | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.30 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $72.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $77.7M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.1M | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $121.4M | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.1M | $138.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $174.3M | $144.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.5M | $-55.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-35.7M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.5M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-212.6M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-616.9M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4M | $-26.0M |
| Q4 25 | 57.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.2% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 66.3% | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 55.5% | 44.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 68.2% | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.2% | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 73.3% | 44.4% |
| Q4 25 | -47.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.0% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -34.7% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -23.9% | -9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -162.7% | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -297.3% | -18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | -17.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.5% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.9% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.4% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -155.7% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -378.1% | -18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.8% | -18.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.30 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.33 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.05 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $72.8M | $71.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.6M | $852.5M |
| Total Assets | $278.0M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $72.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.4M | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.6M | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.3M | $70.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $315.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $361.1M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $345.5M | $70.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $390.8M | $91.1M |
| Q4 25 | $119.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.1M | $852.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.9M | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $185.7M | $784.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $185.0M | $831.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $365.5M | $850.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $963.5M | $866.1M |
| Q4 25 | $278.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $378.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $438.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $869.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.0M | $6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-15.5M | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -21.3% | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.9% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.6M | $-11.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.8M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.5M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.5M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.2M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.3M | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-943.0K | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.1M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.7M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.6M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.3M | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | -21.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.5% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.3% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.2% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.5% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | 1.6% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
