vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL INC (CHH) and SILICON LABORATORIES INC. (SLAB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($390.1M vs $208.2M, roughly 1.9× SILICON LABORATORIES INC.). On growth, SILICON LABORATORIES INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.2% vs 0.1%). CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($64.1M vs $-1.6M). Over the past eight quarters, SILICON LABORATORIES INC.'s revenue compounded faster (39.9% CAGR vs 8.4%).
Choice Hotels International, Inc. is an American multinational hospitality company based in North Bethesda, Maryland. The company, which is one of the largest hotel chains in the world, owns various hotel brands ranging from upscale to economy. As of the end of 2024, Choice Hotels franchised nearly 7,600 hotels, representing over 650,000 rooms, in 46 countries and territories.
Silicon Laboratories, Inc., commonly referred to as Silicon Labs, is a fabless global technology company that designs and manufactures semiconductors, other silicon devices and software, which it sells to electronics design engineers and manufacturers in Internet of Things (IoT) infrastructure worldwide.
CHH vs SLAB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $390.1M | $208.2M |
| Net Profit | $63.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 63.4% |
| Operating Margin | 26.0% | -1.6% |
| Net Margin | 16.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 0.1% | 25.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -16.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.35 | $-0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $208.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $390.1M | $206.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.3M | $192.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $426.4M | $177.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $332.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $389.8M | $166.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $428.0M | $166.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $435.2M | $145.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $180.0M | $-21.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $105.7M | $-28.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.1M | $-82.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 63.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 57.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 56.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 55.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 54.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 54.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.0% | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.8% | -11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.2% | -18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.6% | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.5% | -17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.5% | -33.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | -4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.2% | -11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.7% | -17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.0% | -56.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.35 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.86 | $-0.67 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.75 | $-0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.94 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.56 | $-0.72 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.22 | $-0.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.80 | $-2.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $45.0M | $443.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $181.2M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 10.52× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $443.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $439.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.6M | $415.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.6M | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.2M | $382.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $369.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.4M | $339.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $181.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $149.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-63.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-45.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-96.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-146.8M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.52× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.81× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $85.7M | $8.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $64.1M | $-1.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.4% | -0.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.35× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $163.6M | $65.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $85.7M | $34.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.7M | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.6M | $48.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.9M | $10.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.9M | $31.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.9M | $16.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $64.1M | $27.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.1M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.4M | $43.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.4M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.6M | $29.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.6M | $12.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.4% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.3% | 24.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.6% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.9% | 8.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CHH
| Franchise And Management Fees | $157.3M | 40% |
| Revenue For Reimbursable Costs From Franchised And Managed Properties | $156.0M | 40% |
| Partnership Services And Fees | $32.5M | 8% |
| Owned Hotels | $30.1M | 8% |
| Other Revenue Topic606And Not Topic606 | $14.3M | 4% |
SLAB
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $157.5M | 76% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $50.7M | 24% |
