vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) and FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC. (FORR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($105.7M vs $101.1M, roughly 1.0× FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.). FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC. runs the higher net margin — -33.5% vs -49.7%, a 16.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.1% vs -6.5%). FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-4.3M vs $-23.6M). Over the past eight quarters, FORRESTER RESEARCH, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (0.5% CAGR vs -4.5%).
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. is an American electric vehicle infrastructure company based in Campbell, California. ChargePoint operates the largest online network of independently owned EV charging stations operating in 14 countries and makes some of its technology.
Forrester Research, Inc. is a research and advisory firm working in research, consulting and events. Forrester’s clients include large global business, technology and consumer enterprises. The firm is headquartered in Cambridge, MA.
CHPT vs FORR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $105.7M | $101.1M |
| Net Profit | $-52.5M | $-33.9M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | 56.7% |
| Operating Margin | -42.0% | -36.6% |
| Net Margin | -49.7% | -33.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.1% | -6.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.4% | -7941.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.23 | $-1.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $105.7M | $101.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.6M | $94.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.6M | $111.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $101.9M | $89.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.6M | $108.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $108.5M | $102.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.0M | $121.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $115.8M | $100.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-52.5M | $-33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-66.2M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-57.1M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-58.8M | $-87.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-77.6M | $432.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-68.9M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-71.8M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-94.7M | $-6.7M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | 56.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.2% | 60.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | 55.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.2% | 55.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.9% | 58.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.6% | 60.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.1% | 57.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.3% | 54.9% |
| Q4 25 | -42.0% | -36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -59.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -55.1% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -53.9% | -97.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -68.4% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -57.8% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -62.7% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -80.2% | -9.3% |
| Q4 25 | -49.7% | -33.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -67.1% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -58.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -57.7% | -97.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -77.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -63.5% | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -81.8% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.23 | $-1.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.85 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.83 | $-4.62 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.56 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.22 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.17 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-23.36 | $-0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $180.5M | $63.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $38.4M | $126.5M |
| Total Assets | $848.0M | $404.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $180.5M | $63.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $194.1M | $65.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $195.9M | $67.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $224.6M | $75.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $219.4M | $56.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $243.3M | $62.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.9M | $58.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $327.4M | $61.4M |
| Q4 25 | $38.4M | $126.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.7M | $157.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.6M | $159.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $137.5M | $147.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $181.0M | $229.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $230.9M | $234.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $277.9M | $237.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $327.7M | $230.9M |
| Q4 25 | $848.0M | $404.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $870.3M | $414.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $897.6M | $436.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $898.2M | $439.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $966.3M | $503.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $505.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $524.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $555.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-22.5M | $-3.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-23.6M | $-4.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -22.3% | -4.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-69.6M | $18.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-22.5M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-33.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.7M | $26.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.6M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-51.2M | $264.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-62.5M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-41.5M | $611.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-23.6M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | $524.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-34.0M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.6M | $26.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-33.4M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-55.0M | $-223.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-66.0M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-46.2M | $-815.0K |
| Q4 25 | -22.3% | -4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -34.9% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.5% | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -33.5% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -50.7% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -61.7% | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -39.9% | -0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.1% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.24× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.46× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CHPT
| Products | $56.4M | 53% |
| License And Service | $42.0M | 40% |
| Other | $7.3M | 7% |
FORR
| Research Segment | $82.2M | 81% |
| Consulting Segment | $16.2M | 16% |
| Billable Expenses | $1.5M | 2% |
| Professional Services | $1.4M | 1% |
