vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of C.H. Robinson (CHRW) and Oscar Health, Inc. (OSCR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

C.H. Robinson is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.9B vs $2.8B, roughly 1.4× Oscar Health, Inc.). C.H. Robinson runs the higher net margin — 3.5% vs -3933.2%, a 3936.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Oscar Health, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.3% vs -6.5%). Oscar Health, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.1B vs $302.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Oscar Health, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (14.4% CAGR vs -5.8%).

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. is an American transportation company that includes third-party logistics (3PL). The company offers freight transportation, transportation management, brokerage and warehousing. It offers truckload, less than truckload, air freight, intermodal, and ocean transportation.

Oscar Health, Inc. is an American for-profit health insurance company, founded in 2012 by Joshua Kushner, Kevin Nazemi and Mario Schlosser, and is headquartered in New York City. The company focuses on the health insurance industry through telemedicine, healthcare focused technological interfaces, and transparent claims pricing systems which would make it easier for patients to navigate.

CHRW vs OSCR — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CHRW
CHRW
1.4× larger
CHRW
$3.9B
$2.8B
OSCR
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
OSCR
OSCR
+23.8% gap
OSCR
17.3%
-6.5%
CHRW
Higher net margin
CHRW
CHRW
3936.7% more per $
CHRW
3.5%
-3933.2%
OSCR
More free cash flow
OSCR
OSCR
$756.1M more FCF
OSCR
$1.1B
$302.4M
CHRW
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
OSCR
OSCR
Annualised
OSCR
14.4%
-5.8%
CHRW

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
CHRW
CHRW
OSCR
OSCR
Revenue
$3.9B
$2.8B
Net Profit
$136.3M
$-352.6M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
4.6%
-3722.8%
Net Margin
3.5%
-3933.2%
Revenue YoY
-6.5%
17.3%
Net Profit YoY
-8.7%
-129.6%
EPS (diluted)
$1.12
$-1.19

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CHRW
CHRW
OSCR
OSCR
Q4 25
$3.9B
$2.8B
Q3 25
$4.1B
$3.0B
Q2 25
$4.1B
$2.9B
Q1 25
$4.0B
$3.0B
Q4 24
$4.2B
$2.4B
Q3 24
$4.6B
$2.4B
Q2 24
$4.5B
$2.2B
Q1 24
$4.4B
$2.1B
Net Profit
CHRW
CHRW
OSCR
OSCR
Q4 25
$136.3M
$-352.6M
Q3 25
$163.0M
$-137.4M
Q2 25
$152.5M
$-228.4M
Q1 25
$135.3M
$275.3M
Q4 24
$149.3M
$-153.5M
Q3 24
$97.2M
$-54.6M
Q2 24
$126.3M
$56.2M
Q1 24
$92.9M
$177.4M
Operating Margin
CHRW
CHRW
OSCR
OSCR
Q4 25
4.6%
-3722.8%
Q3 25
5.3%
-4.3%
Q2 25
5.2%
-8.0%
Q1 25
4.4%
9.8%
Q4 24
4.4%
-3070.1%
Q3 24
3.9%
-2.0%
Q2 24
4.0%
3.1%
Q1 24
2.9%
8.7%
Net Margin
CHRW
CHRW
OSCR
OSCR
Q4 25
3.5%
-3933.2%
Q3 25
3.9%
-4.6%
Q2 25
3.7%
-8.0%
Q1 25
3.3%
9.0%
Q4 24
3.6%
-3190.9%
Q3 24
2.1%
-2.3%
Q2 24
2.8%
2.5%
Q1 24
2.1%
8.3%
EPS (diluted)
CHRW
CHRW
OSCR
OSCR
Q4 25
$1.12
$-1.19
Q3 25
$1.34
$-0.53
Q2 25
$1.26
$-0.89
Q1 25
$1.11
$0.92
Q4 24
$1.23
$-0.50
Q3 24
$0.80
$-0.22
Q2 24
$1.05
$0.20
Q1 24
$0.78
$0.62

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CHRW
CHRW
OSCR
OSCR
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$160.9M
$2.8B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.1B
$430.1M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.8B
$977.6M
Total Assets
$5.1B
$6.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.59×
0.44×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CHRW
CHRW
OSCR
OSCR
Q4 25
$160.9M
$2.8B
Q3 25
$136.8M
$2.1B
Q2 25
$156.0M
$2.6B
Q1 25
$129.9M
$2.2B
Q4 24
$145.8M
$2.2B
Q3 24
$131.7M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$113.2M
$2.3B
Q1 24
$121.8M
$2.2B
Total Debt
CHRW
CHRW
OSCR
OSCR
Q4 25
$1.1B
$430.1M
Q3 25
$1.2B
$686.3M
Q2 25
$1.4B
$299.9M
Q1 25
$1.4B
$299.7M
Q4 24
$1.4B
$299.6M
Q3 24
$1.6B
$299.4M
Q2 24
$1.6B
$299.2M
Q1 24
$1.7B
$299.0M
Stockholders' Equity
CHRW
CHRW
OSCR
OSCR
Q4 25
$1.8B
$977.6M
Q3 25
$1.9B
$1.0B
Q2 25
$1.8B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$1.7B
$1.3B
Q4 24
$1.7B
$1.0B
Q3 24
$1.6B
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.5B
$1.1B
Q1 24
$1.4B
$1.0B
Total Assets
CHRW
CHRW
OSCR
OSCR
Q4 25
$5.1B
$6.3B
Q3 25
$5.2B
$5.7B
Q2 25
$5.3B
$6.4B
Q1 25
$5.2B
$5.8B
Q4 24
$5.3B
$4.8B
Q3 24
$5.6B
$4.5B
Q2 24
$5.5B
$5.0B
Q1 24
$5.5B
$4.4B
Debt / Equity
CHRW
CHRW
OSCR
OSCR
Q4 25
0.59×
0.44×
Q3 25
0.64×
0.67×
Q2 25
0.76×
0.26×
Q1 25
0.80×
0.22×
Q4 24
0.80×
0.30×
Q3 24
0.95×
0.26×
Q2 24
1.07×
0.26×
Q1 24
1.19×
0.29×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CHRW
CHRW
OSCR
OSCR
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$305.4M
$1.1B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$302.4M
$1.1B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
7.7%
37.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.1%
1.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.24×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$894.9M
$1.5B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CHRW
CHRW
OSCR
OSCR
Q4 25
$305.4M
$1.1B
Q3 25
$275.4M
$-964.7M
Q2 25
$227.1M
$509.1M
Q1 25
$106.5M
$878.5M
Q4 24
$267.9M
$978.2M
Q3 24
$108.1M
$-500.1M
Q2 24
$166.4M
$497.2M
Q1 24
$-33.3M
$634.4M
Free Cash Flow
CHRW
CHRW
OSCR
OSCR
Q4 25
$302.4M
$1.1B
Q3 25
$269.5M
$-973.7M
Q2 25
$219.8M
$499.8M
Q1 25
$103.2M
$869.5M
Q4 24
$265.3M
$950.3M
Q3 24
$103.3M
$-507.7M
Q2 24
$159.8M
$489.6M
Q1 24
$-41.9M
$628.4M
FCF Margin
CHRW
CHRW
OSCR
OSCR
Q4 25
7.7%
37.7%
Q3 25
6.5%
-32.6%
Q2 25
5.3%
17.5%
Q1 25
2.5%
28.5%
Q4 24
6.3%
39.7%
Q3 24
2.2%
-20.9%
Q2 24
3.6%
22.1%
Q1 24
-1.0%
29.3%
Capex Intensity
CHRW
CHRW
OSCR
OSCR
Q4 25
0.1%
1.3%
Q3 25
0.1%
0.3%
Q2 25
0.2%
0.3%
Q1 25
0.1%
0.3%
Q4 24
0.1%
1.2%
Q3 24
0.1%
0.3%
Q2 24
0.1%
0.3%
Q1 24
0.2%
0.3%
Cash Conversion
CHRW
CHRW
OSCR
OSCR
Q4 25
2.24×
Q3 25
1.69×
Q2 25
1.49×
Q1 25
0.79×
3.19×
Q4 24
1.79×
Q3 24
1.11×
Q2 24
1.32×
8.85×
Q1 24
-0.36×
3.58×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CHRW
CHRW

North American Service Transportation NAST$2.8B72%
Global Forwarding$731.0M19%
Sourcing$340.9M9%

OSCR
OSCR

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons