vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of C.H. Robinson (CHRW) and Unum Group (UNM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

C.H. Robinson is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.9B vs $3.4B, roughly 1.2× Unum Group). Unum Group runs the higher net margin — 6.9% vs 3.5%, a 3.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Unum Group posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.5% vs -6.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Unum Group's revenue compounded faster (1.9% CAGR vs -5.8%).

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. is an American transportation company that includes third-party logistics (3PL). The company offers freight transportation, transportation management, brokerage and warehousing. It offers truckload, less than truckload, air freight, intermodal, and ocean transportation.

Unum Group is an American insurance company headquartered in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Founded as Union Mutual in 1848 and known as UnumProvident from 1999–2007, the company is part of the Fortune 500. Unum Group was created by the 1999 merger of Unum Corporation and The Provident Companies and comprises four distinct businesses – Unum US, Unum UK, Unum Poland and Colonial Life. Its underwriting insurers include The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co...

CHRW vs UNM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CHRW
CHRW
1.2× larger
CHRW
$3.9B
$3.4B
UNM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
UNM
UNM
+15.0% gap
UNM
8.5%
-6.5%
CHRW
Higher net margin
UNM
UNM
3.4% more per $
UNM
6.9%
3.5%
CHRW
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
UNM
UNM
Annualised
UNM
1.9%
-5.8%
CHRW

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
CHRW
CHRW
UNM
UNM
Revenue
$3.9B
$3.4B
Net Profit
$136.3M
$232.0M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
4.6%
Net Margin
3.5%
6.9%
Revenue YoY
-6.5%
8.5%
Net Profit YoY
-8.7%
22.7%
EPS (diluted)
$1.12

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
CHRW
CHRW
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
$3.4B
Q4 25
$3.9B
$3.2B
Q3 25
$4.1B
$3.4B
Q2 25
$4.1B
$3.4B
Q1 25
$4.0B
$3.1B
Q4 24
$4.2B
$3.2B
Q3 24
$4.6B
$3.2B
Q2 24
$4.5B
$3.2B
Net Profit
CHRW
CHRW
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
$232.0M
Q4 25
$136.3M
$174.1M
Q3 25
$163.0M
$39.7M
Q2 25
$152.5M
$335.6M
Q1 25
$135.3M
$189.1M
Q4 24
$149.3M
$348.7M
Q3 24
$97.2M
$645.7M
Q2 24
$126.3M
$389.5M
Operating Margin
CHRW
CHRW
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.6%
6.7%
Q3 25
5.3%
1.6%
Q2 25
5.2%
12.4%
Q1 25
4.4%
7.9%
Q4 24
4.4%
13.8%
Q3 24
3.9%
15.6%
Q2 24
4.0%
15.3%
Net Margin
CHRW
CHRW
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
6.9%
Q4 25
3.5%
5.4%
Q3 25
3.9%
1.2%
Q2 25
3.7%
10.0%
Q1 25
3.3%
6.1%
Q4 24
3.6%
10.8%
Q3 24
2.1%
20.1%
Q2 24
2.8%
12.0%
EPS (diluted)
CHRW
CHRW
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.12
$1.06
Q3 25
$1.34
$0.23
Q2 25
$1.26
$1.92
Q1 25
$1.11
$1.06
Q4 24
$1.23
$1.91
Q3 24
$0.80
$3.46
Q2 24
$1.05
$2.05

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
CHRW
CHRW
UNM
UNM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$160.9M
$2.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.1B
$3.8M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.8B
$10.9M
Total Assets
$5.1B
$62.7M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.59×
0.35×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
CHRW
CHRW
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
$2.1M
Q4 25
$160.9M
Q3 25
$136.8M
Q2 25
$156.0M
Q1 25
$129.9M
Q4 24
$145.8M
Q3 24
$131.7M
Q2 24
$113.2M
Total Debt
CHRW
CHRW
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
$3.8M
Q4 25
$1.1B
$3.8B
Q3 25
$1.2B
$3.5B
Q2 25
$1.4B
$3.5B
Q1 25
$1.4B
$3.5B
Q4 24
$1.4B
$3.5B
Q3 24
$1.6B
$3.5B
Q2 24
$1.6B
$3.5B
Stockholders' Equity
CHRW
CHRW
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
$10.9M
Q4 25
$1.8B
$11.1B
Q3 25
$1.9B
$10.9B
Q2 25
$1.8B
$11.3B
Q1 25
$1.7B
$11.2B
Q4 24
$1.7B
$11.0B
Q3 24
$1.6B
$11.0B
Q2 24
$1.5B
$10.5B
Total Assets
CHRW
CHRW
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
$62.7M
Q4 25
$5.1B
$63.5B
Q3 25
$5.2B
$63.7B
Q2 25
$5.3B
$62.8B
Q1 25
$5.2B
$62.5B
Q4 24
$5.3B
$62.0B
Q3 24
$5.6B
$64.1B
Q2 24
$5.5B
$62.0B
Debt / Equity
CHRW
CHRW
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
0.35×
Q4 25
0.59×
0.34×
Q3 25
0.64×
0.32×
Q2 25
0.76×
0.31×
Q1 25
0.80×
0.31×
Q4 24
0.80×
0.32×
Q3 24
0.95×
0.32×
Q2 24
1.07×
0.33×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
CHRW
CHRW
UNM
UNM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$305.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$302.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
7.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.24×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$894.9M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
CHRW
CHRW
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$305.4M
$357.9M
Q3 25
$275.4M
$-371.8M
Q2 25
$227.1M
$348.0M
Q1 25
$106.5M
$353.6M
Q4 24
$267.9M
$485.8M
Q3 24
$108.1M
$390.0M
Q2 24
$166.4M
$339.1M
Free Cash Flow
CHRW
CHRW
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$302.4M
$320.1M
Q3 25
$269.5M
$-402.6M
Q2 25
$219.8M
$320.1M
Q1 25
$103.2M
$317.8M
Q4 24
$265.3M
$453.8M
Q3 24
$103.3M
$352.3M
Q2 24
$159.8M
$311.4M
FCF Margin
CHRW
CHRW
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
Q4 25
7.7%
9.9%
Q3 25
6.5%
-11.9%
Q2 25
5.3%
9.5%
Q1 25
2.5%
10.3%
Q4 24
6.3%
14.0%
Q3 24
2.2%
11.0%
Q2 24
3.6%
9.6%
Capex Intensity
CHRW
CHRW
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.1%
1.2%
Q3 25
0.1%
0.9%
Q2 25
0.2%
0.8%
Q1 25
0.1%
1.2%
Q4 24
0.1%
1.0%
Q3 24
0.1%
1.2%
Q2 24
0.1%
0.9%
Cash Conversion
CHRW
CHRW
UNM
UNM
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.24×
2.06×
Q3 25
1.69×
-9.37×
Q2 25
1.49×
1.04×
Q1 25
0.79×
1.87×
Q4 24
1.79×
1.39×
Q3 24
1.11×
0.60×
Q2 24
1.32×
0.87×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

CHRW
CHRW

North American Service Transportation NAST$2.8B72%
Global Forwarding$731.0M19%
Sourcing$340.9M9%

UNM
UNM

Premium Income$2.8B83%
Other$561.2M17%

Related Comparisons