vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Chanson International Holding (CHSN) and Moolec Science SA (MLEC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Chanson International Holding is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.7M vs $2.6M, roughly 3.3× Moolec Science SA). Chanson International Holding runs the higher net margin — -12.1% vs -91.8%, a 79.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Chanson International Holding is a food and beverage enterprise focused on operating premium bakery chains primarily across mainland China. Its product portfolio includes freshly baked bread, handcrafted pastries, custom celebration cakes, specialty beverages, and frozen bakery goods supplied to partnered retail outlets, catering to middle-class consumers with demand for high-quality daily food options.
Moolec Science SA is a global agricultural biotechnology and food technology company specializing in molecular farming. It uses engineered crop platforms to produce sustainable, cost-competitive animal-derived proteins for use in alternative meat, dairy products and food ingredients, serving food manufacturers, agribusinesses and consumer goods brands across North America, Europe and Latin America.
CHSN vs MLEC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.7M | $2.6M |
| Net Profit | $-1.0M | $-2.4M |
| Gross Margin | 44.5% | -25.5% |
| Operating Margin | -13.7% | -77.9% |
| Net Margin | -12.1% | -91.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -4579.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.7M |
| Q2 25 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.4K | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-1.6M |
| Q2 25 | 44.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -25.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 12.7% |
| Q2 25 | -13.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -77.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.4% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -130.3% |
| Q2 25 | -12.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -91.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -91.4% |
| Q2 25 | $-2.87 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.1M | $1.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.5M | $2.8M |
| Total Assets | $51.6M | $31.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $22.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $853.6K |
| Q2 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | $24.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $8.9M |
| Q2 25 | $51.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.7M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $22.5M |
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-390.3K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $-390.3K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $806.1K | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-1.7M |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $771.9K | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-1.8M |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -106.2% |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 6.0% |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.43× | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
