vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of General Enterprise Ventures, Inc. (CITR) and SYNAPTICS Inc (SYNA), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SYNAPTICS Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($302.5M vs $288.2K, roughly 1049.6× General Enterprise Ventures, Inc.). SYNAPTICS Inc runs the higher net margin — -2751.2% vs -4.9%, a 2746.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, General Enterprise Ventures, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (169.3% vs 13.2%). SYNAPTICS Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($18.2M vs $-1.5M). Over the past eight quarters, General Enterprise Ventures, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (28.4% CAGR vs 12.9%).
The Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) is an American multinational information technology company based in Spring, Texas. It is a business-focused organization which works in servers, storage, networking, containerization software and consulting and support. HPE was ranked No. 107 in the 2018 Fortune 500 list of the largest United States corporations by total revenue.
Synaptics, Inc. is an American neural network technologies and computer-to-human interface devices development company based in San Jose, California. It develops touchpads and fingerprint biometrics technology for computer laptops; touch, display driver, and fingerprint biometrics technology for smartphones; and touch, video and far-field voice, low-power AI processors, and wireless technology for smart home devices, wearables, and automobiles. Synaptics sells its products to original equipme...
CITR vs SYNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q2 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $288.2K | $302.5M |
| Net Profit | $-7.9M | $-14.8M |
| Gross Margin | -99.7% | 43.5% |
| Operating Margin | -1470.3% | -5.0% |
| Net Margin | -2751.2% | -4.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 169.3% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1110.1% | -922.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.59 | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $302.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $288.2K | $292.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $687.6K | $282.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $969.4K | $266.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $267.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $107.0K | $257.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $198.7K | $247.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $433.0K | $237.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-14.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.9M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.9M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.9M | $-21.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-655.2K | $-23.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-907.4K | $208.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.5M | $-18.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -99.7% | 42.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.0% | 43.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.5% | 43.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -30.0% | 46.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.6% | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 79.2% | 46.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1470.3% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -438.8% | -8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -356.8% | -9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -524.4% | -11.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -456.7% | -12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -608.9% | -7.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2751.2% | -7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1731.1% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1124.8% | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -612.1% | -9.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -456.7% | 84.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -812.8% | -7.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.59 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.23 | $-0.56 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | $-0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.02 | $5.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $437.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $836.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.5M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $12.3M | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.60× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $437.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $459.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $452.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $421.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $596.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $853.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $876.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $828.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $836.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $835.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $834.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $834.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $832.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $983.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.3M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.5M | $29.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.5M | $18.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -525.6% | 6.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 18.7% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $154.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $29.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.2M | $57.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-713.9K | $73.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-551.3K | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-424.9K | $65.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-343.7K | $-13.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $18.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4M | $50.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-740.9K | $68.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-20.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $57.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-22.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -525.6% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -196.7% | 17.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -76.4% | 25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -9.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 3.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CITR
Segment breakdown not available.
SYNA
| Enterprise And Automotive Product Applications | $161.1M | 53% |
| Internet Of Things Product Applications | $93.2M | 31% |
| Mobile Product Applications | $48.2M | 16% |
