vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC. (CIVB) and Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($47.3M vs $26.9M, roughly 1.8× Hyperscale Data, Inc.). CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs -112.0%, a 143.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (11.3% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Civista Bancshares, Inc. is a US-based bank holding company operating primarily across the Midwest region. It provides a full suite of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, mortgage, consumer and commercial lending products, as well as wealth management solutions, serving retail consumers, small and medium-sized local businesses and community client segments.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
CIVB vs GPUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $47.3M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $15.0M | $-30.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -117.8% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | -112.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 38.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 47.4% | -6670.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $47.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.3M | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.2M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.4M | $25.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.6M | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.4M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.3M | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.1M | $17.8M |
| Q1 26 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-30.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-445.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $-33.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -21.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.8% | -117.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.4% | -57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.1% | -39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | -25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.2% | -46.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | -79.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | -151.4% |
| Q1 26 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -112.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | -53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.6% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.0% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.3% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.5% | -190.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.59 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.68 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.71 | $-2.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.66 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.62 | $-8.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.53 | $-24.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.45 | $-37.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $13.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $83.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $553.9M | $119.8M |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $313.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $88.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $96.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $104.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $106.8M |
| Q1 26 | $553.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $543.5M | $119.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $499.0M | $55.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.1M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $397.4M | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.5M | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.4M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $373.8M | $26.7M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $313.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $213.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $218.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $231.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $270.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-37.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-56.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -208.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 68.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-87.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.3M | $-37.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.2M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.2M | $-3.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.1M | $-56.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 90.9% | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -84.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | -27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 109.1% | -47.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -33.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 68.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.73× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CIVB
| Net Interest Income | $37.8M | 80% |
| Noninterest Income | $9.4M | 20% |
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
