vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC. (CIVB) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Planet Labs PBC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($81.3M vs $47.3M, roughly 1.7× CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC.). CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs -72.8%, a 104.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Planet Labs PBC's revenue compounded faster (17.5% CAGR vs 11.3%).
Civista Bancshares, Inc. is a US-based bank holding company operating primarily across the Midwest region. It provides a full suite of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, mortgage, consumer and commercial lending products, as well as wealth management solutions, serving retail consumers, small and medium-sized local businesses and community client segments.
Planet Labs PBC, known as "Planet.", is a publicly traded American Earth imaging company based in San Francisco, California. Their goal is to image the entirety of the Earth daily to monitor changes and pinpoint trends.
CIVB vs PL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $47.3M | $81.3M |
| Net Profit | $15.0M | $-59.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -22.6% |
| Net Margin | 31.7% | -72.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 32.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 47.4% | -194.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | $-0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $47.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $46.3M | $81.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.2M | $73.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.4M | $66.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.6M | $61.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.4M | $61.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.3M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.1M | $60.4M |
| Q1 26 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-59.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $-22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $-12.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2M | $-35.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-20.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-38.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $-29.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 57.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 55.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 62.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 61.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.8% | -22.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.4% | -24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.1% | -34.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | -31.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.2% | -36.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | -64.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | -57.2% |
| Q1 26 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -72.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | -30.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.6% | -19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.0% | -57.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -32.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.3% | -63.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.5% | -48.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.59 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.68 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.71 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.66 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.62 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.53 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.45 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $443.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $553.9M | $349.6M |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $443.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $181.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $133.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $118.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $139.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $148.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $107.4M |
| Q1 26 | $553.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $543.5M | $349.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $499.0M | $435.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $404.1M | $444.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $397.4M | $441.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.5M | $464.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $394.4M | $473.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $373.8M | $500.3M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $696.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $658.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $633.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $630.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $658.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $674.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $28.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 2.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 32.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $40.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.3M | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $67.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.2M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.2M | $-4.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $42.1M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $47.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5M | $-17.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-14.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 90.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | -29.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 109.1% | -5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -37.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -23.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 18.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.73× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CIVB
| Net Interest Income | $37.8M | 80% |
| Noninterest Income | $9.4M | 20% |
PL
| Defense And Intelligence | $49.4M | 61% |
| Civil Government | $18.8M | 23% |
| Commercial | $13.1M | 16% |
