vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CIVITAS RESOURCES, INC. (CIVI) and Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CIVITAS RESOURCES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.1× Leonardo DRS, Inc.). On growth, Leonardo DRS, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs -8.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (24.1% CAGR vs 1.8%).
Civitas Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based sustainable energy enterprise focused on the exploration, development, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. It primarily operates across the Denver-Julesburg Basin in Colorado, prioritizing low-emission, responsible energy production to meet diverse North American energy demand.
Leonardo DRS, Inc. is a United States–based defense contractor. Originally founded as DRS Technologies, Inc. and traded on the NYSE, it was acquired by Leonardo’s predecessor Finmeccanica in 2008. Leonardo DRS provides advanced defense technologies and systems primarily to the U.S. military.
CIVI vs DRS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | — | $102.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 25.4% |
| Operating Margin | 20.0% | 11.9% |
| Net Margin | — | 9.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 14.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.99 | $0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $960.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $829.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $799.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $981.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $812.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $753.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $688.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $102.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $54.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $89.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $57.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $38.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $29.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.3% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.4% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.9% | 6.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.99 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.34 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.99 | $0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.56 | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.01 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.15 | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.74 | $0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $56.0M | $647.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | $321.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.7B | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $15.1B | $4.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.77× | 0.12× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $647.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.0M | $309.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.0M | $278.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.0M | $380.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.0M | $598.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.1M | $198.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.9M | $149.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.1M | $160.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $321.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | $326.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $331.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1B | $335.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | $345.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $351.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $356.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.4B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.9B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1B | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.77× | 0.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.79× | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.76× | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.68× | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.73× | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.74× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.67× | 0.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $860.0M | $425.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $376.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 35.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.17× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $227.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $425.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $860.0M | $107.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $298.0M | $-28.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $719.0M | $-138.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $858.2M | $443.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $835.0M | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $359.0M | $34.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $813.0M | $-265.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $376.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $77.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-56.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-170.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $414.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-275.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -21.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -40.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.76× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.89× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -9.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CIVI
| Crude Oil Natural Gas And Natural Gas Liquids | $1.2B | 99% |
| Oil And Gas Operation And Maintenance | $8.0M | 1% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $2.0M | 0% |
DRS
Segment breakdown not available.
