vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) and Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Clearfield, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($34.3M vs $26.9M, roughly 1.3× Hyperscale Data, Inc.). Clearfield, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1.8% vs -112.0%, a 110.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyperscale Data, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.4% vs -3.2%). Clearfield, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-2.4M vs $-56.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Clearfield, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-3.5% CAGR vs -16.3%).
Clearfield, Inc. is a company headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The company produces fiber optic products.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
CLFD vs GPUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $34.3M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $-614.0K | $-30.1M |
| Gross Margin | 33.2% | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | -5.3% | -117.8% |
| Net Margin | -1.8% | -112.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.2% | 38.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 67.8% | -6670.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.4M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.9M | $25.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.2M | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.7M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.8M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.9M | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-614.0K | $-30.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.1M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $-445.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-447.0K | $-33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.9M | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | 33.2% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.2% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.5% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.1% | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | -21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | 47.4% |
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | -117.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.3% | -57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | -39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | -25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.9% | -46.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -79.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | -151.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -26.4% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | -1.8% | -112.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -38.8% | -53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.4% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.9% | -190.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.0% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.65 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $-2.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $-8.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-24.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $-37.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | $3.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $96.4M | $13.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $83.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $249.7M | $119.8M |
| Total Assets | $268.1M | $313.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $96.4M | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.0M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.2M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.0M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.0M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.0M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.8M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $142.9M | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $88.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $96.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $104.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1M | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.0M |
| Q4 25 | $249.7M | $119.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $256.2M | $55.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.5M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.9M | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $267.4M | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.8M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.6M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $279.2M | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | $268.1M | $313.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $306.2M | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $314.7M | $213.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.9M | $218.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.2M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.3M | $231.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $318.1M | $270.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $315.4M | $299.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | 38.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | 4.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.51× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.4M | $-37.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.4M | $-56.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -7.1% | -208.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | 68.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-87.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.4M | $-37.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-17.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.2M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.7M | $-10.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.4M | $-56.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $654.0K | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.7M | $-11.6M |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -84.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | -27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.1% | -47.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 323.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | -33.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.8% | -30.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 68.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.93× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLFD
Segment breakdown not available.
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
