vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) and LANDMARK BANCORP INC (LARK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Clearfield, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($34.3M vs $18.8M, roughly 1.8× LANDMARK BANCORP INC). LANDMARK BANCORP INC runs the higher net margin — 27.0% vs -1.8%, a 28.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LANDMARK BANCORP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs -3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, LANDMARK BANCORP INC's revenue compounded faster (13.1% CAGR vs -3.5%).
Clearfield, Inc. is a company headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The company produces fiber optic products.
Landmark Bancorp Inc is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating Landmark National Bank, primarily serving communities across Kansas. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, residential mortgages, commercial loans, and wealth management solutions, catering to individual consumers, small businesses and local mid-sized enterprises.
CLFD vs LARK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $34.3M | $18.8M |
| Net Profit | $-614.0K | $5.1M |
| Gross Margin | 33.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -5.3% | — |
| Net Margin | -1.8% | 27.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.2% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 67.8% | 7.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $18.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.4M | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.9M | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.2M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.7M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.8M | $14.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-614.0K | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.1M | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-447.0K | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.3% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 30.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 34.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.9% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | 24.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.8% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -38.8% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 28.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.4% | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.9% | 20.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.04 | $0.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.65 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | $0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.68 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $96.4M | $31.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $249.7M | — |
| Total Assets | $268.1M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $31.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $96.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $249.7M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $256.2M | $155.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.5M | $148.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.9M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $267.4M | $136.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.8M | $139.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.6M | $128.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $268.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $306.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $314.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $318.1M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -7.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.4M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $439.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2M | $14.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.2M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $4.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.4M | $21.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $354.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $654.0K | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | $3.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | 112.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 55.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | 48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.1% | 75.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 323.0% | 49.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 25.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.93× | 0.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 1.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.45× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
