vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) and Sila Realty Trust, Inc. (SILA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sila Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($50.1M vs $34.3M, roughly 1.5× Clearfield, Inc.). Sila Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs -1.8%, a 11.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sila Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs -3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Sila Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.6% CAGR vs -3.5%).
Clearfield, Inc. is a company headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The company produces fiber optic products.
Sila Realty Trust, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that owns, operates, and acquires high-quality income-generating commercial properties. Its core portfolio covers industrial logistics facilities, office assets and mixed-use properties, serving tenants across logistics, corporate and retail segments to deliver stable long-term returns.
CLFD vs SILA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $34.3M | $50.1M |
| Net Profit | $-614.0K | $5.0M |
| Gross Margin | 33.2% | 88.9% |
| Operating Margin | -5.3% | — |
| Net Margin | -1.8% | 10.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.2% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 67.8% | -54.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.04 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.4M | $49.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.9M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.2M | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.7M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.8M | $43.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.9M | $50.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-614.0K | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.1M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-447.0K | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.9M | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | 33.2% | 88.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.2% | 88.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.5% | 87.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.1% | 86.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.2% | 87.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 87.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | 86.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | 89.0% |
| Q4 25 | -5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -26.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -1.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -38.8% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.4% | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.9% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.0% | 29.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.04 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.65 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.04 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $96.4M | $32.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $249.7M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $268.1M | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $96.4M | $32.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.0M | $27.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.2M | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.0M | $30.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.0M | $39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.0M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.8M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $142.9M | $90.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $249.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $256.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $267.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $275.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $279.2M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $268.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $306.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $314.7M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.3M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $318.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $315.4M | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.4M | $119.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -7.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 23.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.4M | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0M | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2M | $132.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.2M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.7M | $36.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $654.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 323.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.93× | 3.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 3.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
