vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and Datadog (DDOG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEAN HARBORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $953.2M, roughly 1.6× Datadog). CLEAN HARBORS INC runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs 4.9%, a 0.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Datadog posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.2% vs 4.8%). Datadog produced more free cash flow last quarter ($318.2M vs $233.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Datadog's revenue compounded faster (24.9% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
Datadog, Inc. is an American company that provides an observability service for cloud-scale applications, providing monitoring of servers, databases, tools, and services, through a SaaS-based data analytics platform. Founded and headquartered in New York City, the company is a publicly traded entity on the Nasdaq stock exchange.
CLH vs DDOG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $953.2M |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $46.6M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 80.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 1.0% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 4.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 29.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | 2.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $953.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $885.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $826.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $761.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $737.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $690.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $645.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $611.3M |
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $33.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $24.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $45.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $43.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.8M | $42.6M |
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | 79.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 79.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 80.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 80.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | 80.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.5% | 82.0% |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | -1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.1% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.29 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | $401.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $3.7B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $6.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $401.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $540.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $489.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $337.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $411.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.8M | $282.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | $4.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | $327.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | $318.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | 33.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | 7.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $327.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $251.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $200.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $271.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $265.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $228.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $164.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | $212.3M |
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | $318.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | $234.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | $184.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | $262.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | $257.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | $220.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $160.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-119.4M | $198.1M |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 33.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | 34.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 34.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 24.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | 32.4% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 7.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 7.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | 75.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 11.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | 5.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | 4.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 3.75× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | 4.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
DDOG
| North America | $678.7M | 71% |
| International | $274.5M | 29% |
