vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and ENTEGRIS INC (ENTG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEAN HARBORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $823.9M, roughly 1.8× ENTEGRIS INC). ENTEGRIS INC runs the higher net margin — 6.0% vs 5.8%, a 0.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CLEAN HARBORS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs -3.1%). CLEAN HARBORS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.3M vs $134.0M). Over the past eight quarters, CLEAN HARBORS INC's revenue compounded faster (4.4% CAGR vs 3.4%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
Entegris, Inc. is a supplier of materials for the semiconductor and other high-tech industries. Entegris has approximately 8,000 employees throughout its global operations. It has manufacturing, customer service and/or research facilities in the United States, Canada, China, Germany, Israel, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan. The company’s corporate headquarters are in Billerica, Massachusetts.
CLH vs ENTG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $823.9M |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $49.4M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 43.8% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 12.7% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 6.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | -3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | -51.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $0.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $823.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $807.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $792.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $773.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $849.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $807.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $812.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $771.0M |
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $49.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $70.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $52.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $62.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $102.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $77.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $67.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.8M | $45.3M |
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | 44.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 46.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 45.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | 46.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.5% | 45.6% |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.1% | 15.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 5.9% |
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $0.67 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $0.51 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.29 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | $360.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $4.0B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $8.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.94× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $360.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $399.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $376.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $340.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $329.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $432.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $320.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.8M | $340.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $8.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $8.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | $8.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.22× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | $192.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | $134.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | 16.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | 7.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | 3.89× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | $396.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $192.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $249.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $113.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $140.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $176.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $197.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $111.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | $147.2M |
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | $182.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | $32.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | $68.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | $115.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $51.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-119.4M | $80.6M |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 3.89× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 3.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | 2.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 2.23× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 1.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | 3.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
ENTG
| Fabs | $516.3M | 63% |
| Equipment And Engineering | $121.8M | 15% |
| Chemical And Materials | $83.8M | 10% |
| Other | $61.7M | 7% |
| Non Semi | $40.3M | 5% |
