vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.2× CLEAN HARBORS INC). F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.3% vs 5.8%, a 1.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs 4.8%). Over the past eight quarters, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.1% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. is a public company headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa. It primarily provides annuities, life insurance, and pension buyout services. The company was founded in 1959.
CLH vs FG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.8B |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $128.0M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | -60.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $0.97 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $908.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $128.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $40.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $327.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $203.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.8M | $115.0M |
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | -2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 21.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $0.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $2.53 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $1.55 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.29 | $0.88 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $4.8B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $98.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.47× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.8M | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $98.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $96.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $91.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $88.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $85.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $84.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $78.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | $74.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.55× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.49× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | 9.13× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $937.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $956.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-119.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 9.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 7.94× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | 40.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 5.20× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | 13.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
FG
Segment breakdown not available.
