vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and Fidelity National Information Services (FIS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fidelity National Information Services is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.9× CLEAN HARBORS INC). Fidelity National Information Services runs the higher net margin — 18.2% vs 5.8%, a 12.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fidelity National Information Services posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs 4.8%). Fidelity National Information Services produced more free cash flow last quarter ($739.0M vs $233.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Fidelity National Information Services's revenue compounded faster (6.8% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is an American multinational corporation which offers a wide range of financial products and services. FIS is most known for its development of Financial Technology, or FinTech. Annually, FIS facilitates the movement of roughly US$9 trillion through the processing of approximately 75 billion transactions in service to more than 20,000 clients around the globe.
CLH vs FIS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $2.8B |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $511.0M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 18.8% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 18.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | 97.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $0.98 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $511.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $264.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $-470.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $77.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $259.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $224.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $243.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.8M | $724.0M |
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 34.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 36.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 38.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | 38.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.5% | 37.1% |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.1% | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | -18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 29.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $0.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $0.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.29 | $1.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | $599.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $13.9B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $33.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $599.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $571.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $581.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $805.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.8M | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $13.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $14.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $15.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $15.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $16.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $17.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $18.0B |
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $33.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $33.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $33.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $32.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $33.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $34.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $34.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | $35.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.59× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | $758.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | $739.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | 26.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | 1.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | $2.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $758.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $382.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $457.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $782.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $641.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $546.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | $206.0M |
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | $739.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | $952.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | $343.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | $420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | $764.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | $605.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $530.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-119.4M | $179.0M |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 35.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 29.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 3.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 5.94× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | 3.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | 2.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | 0.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
FIS
| Banking Solutions | $1.6B | 57% |
| Other | $701.0M | 25% |
| Capital Market Solutions | $508.0M | 18% |
