vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and Hyatt Hotels Corp (H). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hyatt Hotels Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.2× CLEAN HARBORS INC). CLEAN HARBORS INC runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs -1.1%, a 6.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyatt Hotels Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.7% vs 4.8%). Hyatt Hotels Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($236.0M vs $233.3M). Over the past eight quarters, CLEAN HARBORS INC's revenue compounded faster (4.4% CAGR vs 2.2%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
Hyatt Hotels Corporation, commonly known as Hyatt Hotels & Resorts, is an American multinational hospitality company headquartered in the Riverside Plaza area of Chicago that manages and franchises luxury and business hotels, resorts, and vacation properties. Hyatt Hotels & Resorts is one of the businesses managed by the Pritzker family. Hyatt has more than 1350 hotels and all-inclusive properties in 69 countries, across North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia.
CLH vs H — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.8B |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $-20.0M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 0.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | -1.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 11.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | 64.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $-0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $-49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $20.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $-56.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $471.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $359.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.8M | $522.0M |
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | -3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 27.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.1% | 31.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | -0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 30.5% |
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $-0.51 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $4.63 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $3.46 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.29 | $4.93 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | $813.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $14.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $813.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $749.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $912.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.8M | $794.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.1B |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $3.7B |
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $14.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $15.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $15.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $14.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $13.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $12.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | $11.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.84× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | $313.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | $236.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | 13.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | $159.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $313.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $-67.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $153.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $235.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $177.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | $242.0M |
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | $236.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | $-89.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | $-111.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | $123.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | $184.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | $-64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $135.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-119.4M | $208.0M |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | -5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 7.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | -0.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 0.49× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | 0.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
H
| Other | $627.0M | 35% |
| Rooms Revenue | $326.0M | 18% |
| Net Fees | $290.0M | 16% |
| Distribution Segment | $177.0M | 10% |
| Franchise And Other Fees | $114.0M | 6% |
| Base Management Fees | $112.0M | 6% |
| Incentive Management Fees | $81.0M | 5% |
| Other Owned And Leased Hotel Revenue | $41.0M | 2% |
| Contra Revenue | $17.0M | 1% |
| Other Revenues | $4.0M | 0% |
