vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC (JHG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEAN HARBORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.3× JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC). JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC runs the higher net margin — 35.3% vs 5.8%, a 29.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (61.3% vs 4.8%). JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($320.4M vs $233.3M). Over the past eight quarters, JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC's revenue compounded faster (43.9% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
Janus Henderson is a British-American global asset management group headquartered in the City of London, United Kingdom. It offers a range of financial products to individuals, intermediary advisors, and institutional investors globally under the trade name Janus Henderson Investors.
CLH vs JHG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $403.2M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 42.7% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 35.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 61.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | 231.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $2.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $700.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $633.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $621.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $708.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $624.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $588.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $551.7M |
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $403.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $142.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $149.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $120.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $121.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $129.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.8M | $130.1M |
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 42.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 24.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 26.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.1% | 21.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 35.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 22.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 23.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $2.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $0.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $0.77 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.29 | $0.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $5.1B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $8.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.8M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $4.4B |
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $7.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | $6.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | $322.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | $320.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | 28.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | 0.80× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | $710.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $322.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $258.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $135.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $247.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $228.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $223.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | $-5.0M |
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | $320.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | $256.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | $133.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | $900.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | $243.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | $225.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $221.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-119.4M | $-6.8M |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 34.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 36.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 1.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | 0.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 0.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | 2.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | 8.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 1.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | -0.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
JHG
| Investment Advice | $585.2M | 51% |
| Investment Performance | $425.8M | 37% |
| Other | $76.4M | 7% |
