vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and Noble Corp plc (NE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEAN HARBORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $764.4M, roughly 2.0× Noble Corp plc). Noble Corp plc runs the higher net margin — 11.3% vs 5.8%, a 5.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CLEAN HARBORS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs -17.6%). CLEAN HARBORS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.3M vs $35.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Noble Corp plc's revenue compounded faster (9.5% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
Barnes & Noble Booksellers is an American bookseller with the largest number of retail outlets in the United States. The company operates approximately 700+ retail stores across the United States.
CLH vs NE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $764.4M |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $86.6M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 5.6% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 11.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | -17.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | -10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $764.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $798.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $848.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $874.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $927.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $800.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $692.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $637.1M |
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $86.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $42.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $108.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $96.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $61.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $195.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.8M | $95.5M |
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 30.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.1% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 28.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 15.0% |
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $0.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $0.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $0.56 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $1.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.29 | $0.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | $471.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $4.5B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $7.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $471.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $477.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $338.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $303.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $247.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $391.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $162.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.8M | $212.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $3.9B |
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $7.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $5.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | $5.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | $187.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | $35.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | 4.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | 19.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | 2.16× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | $432.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $187.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $277.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $216.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $271.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $136.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $283.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | $128.7M |
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | $139.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | $99.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | $157.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | $-4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | $156.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $-34.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-119.4M | $-37.9M |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 17.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | -6.0% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 13.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | 5.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 2.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | 1.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | 4.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 0.55× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | 1.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
NE
| Floaters | $559.8M | 73% |
| Jackups | $145.5M | 19% |
| Service Other | $59.1M | 8% |
