vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH) and RH (RH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEAN HARBORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $883.8M, roughly 1.7× RH). CLEAN HARBORS INC runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs 4.1%, a 1.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, RH posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.9% vs 4.8%). CLEAN HARBORS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.3M vs $83.0M). Over the past eight quarters, RH's revenue compounded faster (9.4% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
RH is an upscale American home-furnishings company headquartered in Corte Madera, California. The company sells its merchandise through its retail stores, catalog, and online. As of August 2018, the company operated a total of 70 galleries, 18 full-line design galleries, and 3 baby-and-child galleries. The company also has 36 outlet stores in the United States and Canada.
CLH vs RH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5B | $883.8M |
| Net Profit | $86.6M | $36.3M |
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 12.0% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.8% | 8.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | 9.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $1.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $883.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $899.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $814.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $812.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $811.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $829.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $727.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $738.3M |
| Q4 25 | $86.6M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $118.8M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.9M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.7M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $84.0M | $33.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $29.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.3M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.8M | $11.4M |
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | 44.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.3% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.3% | 43.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.6% | 44.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.0% | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.5% | 43.5% |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.6% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.1% | 8.7% |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $1.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.21 | $2.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.36 | $0.40 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.09 | $0.71 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.55 | $1.66 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.12 | $1.45 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.46 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.29 | $0.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $127.4M | $43.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.7B | $3.3M |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.4M | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.2M | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $105.9M | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $102.6M | $87.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.4M | $78.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.3M | $101.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.8M | $123.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $-40.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $-110.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $-163.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $-183.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $-234.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $-289.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $-297.4M |
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9B | $4.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $355.1M | $131.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $233.3M | $83.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.6% | 9.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.1% | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.10× | 3.64× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $441.8M | $128.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $355.1M | $131.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.0M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.0M | $86.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.9M | $-31.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.2M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.0M | $56.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.5M | $-114.0M |
| Q4 25 | $233.3M | $83.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $207.5M | $80.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.0M | $34.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-117.1M | $-69.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.5M | $-96.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.4M | $-37.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $80.9M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-119.4M | $-251.5M |
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | -8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | -11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | -1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | -34.1% |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.3% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | 18.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.10× | 3.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.54× | 2.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.64× | 10.78× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | -1.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.62× | -0.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.27× | -10.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
RH
| RH Segment | $835.8M | 95% |
| Waterworks Segment | $48.0M | 5% |
| Gift Card And Merchandise Credit | $4.5M | 1% |
