vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) and Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.6M vs $9.5M, roughly 1.5× Cellectis S.A.). Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 64.3% vs -265.9%, a 330.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cellectis S.A. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (375.0% vs 92.0%). Cellectis S.A. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.6M vs $8.2M).
Cellectis is a French biopharmaceutical company. It develops genome-edited chimeric antigen receptor T-cell technologies for cancer immunotherapy. It has offices in Paris, New York City, and Raleigh, North Carolina.
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.IDREarnings & Financial Report
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. is a U.S.-based natural resource company focused on the exploration, development, and production of critical and strategic minerals. Primarily operating in Idaho, it targets rare earth elements, gold, silver, and other high-demand minerals, supplying products to the clean energy, defense, and industrial manufacturing sectors across North America.
CLLS vs IDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5M | $14.6M |
| Net Profit | $-25.3M | $9.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 68.5% |
| Operating Margin | -181.1% | 62.4% |
| Net Margin | -265.9% | 64.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 375.0% | 92.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -51.9% | 220.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 68.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 63.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 57.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 53.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 62.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -181.1% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 64.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -265.9% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $149.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $148.6M | $108.2M |
| Total Assets | $407.1M | $116.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $149.0M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $108.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $74.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $39.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.6M | $25.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $21.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $116.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $57.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $407.1M | $32.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $28.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.15× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.9M | $10.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.6M | $8.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 290.5% | 56.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.2% | 17.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $12.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $709.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 56.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 290.5% | 38.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
