vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) and LENZ Therapeutics, Inc. (LENZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LENZ Therapeutics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.5M vs $9.5M, roughly 1.3× Cellectis S.A.). LENZ Therapeutics, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -133.6% vs -265.9%, a 132.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. Cellectis S.A. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.6M vs $-9.0M).
Cellectis is a French biopharmaceutical company. It develops genome-edited chimeric antigen receptor T-cell technologies for cancer immunotherapy. It has offices in Paris, New York City, and Raleigh, North Carolina.
LENZ Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical firm dedicated to developing novel ophthalmic therapies. Its lead product candidates address presbyopia, the age-related loss of near vision, catering to global patient groups with unmet medical needs in the eye care sector.
CLLS vs LENZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2024 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5M | $12.5M |
| Net Profit | $-25.3M | $-16.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -181.1% | -151.1% |
| Net Margin | -265.9% | -133.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 375.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -51.9% | -63.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | $-0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $0 | ||
| Q3 23 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $2.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-16.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.3M | $-10.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | $-17.5M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-16.6M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-19.5M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 97.3% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 87.9% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -151.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -337.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -181.1% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -1258.1% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -1180.5% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -1003.0% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -133.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -298.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -265.9% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -1064.1% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -831.6% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -714.4% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.59 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.53 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 23 | $-0.31 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-0.42 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $149.0M | $25.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $148.6M | $193.9M |
| Total Assets | $407.1M | $210.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $25.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $37.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $41.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $149.0M | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $84.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $129.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $193.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $206.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $215.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.6M | $192.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | $76.1M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $96.6M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $180.5M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $210.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $217.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $224.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $407.1M | $202.6M | ||
| Q3 23 | $209.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $227.7M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $320.9M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.9M | $-8.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.6M | $-9.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 290.5% | -72.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.2% | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-47.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $-8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-47.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-60.2M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-47.9M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-61.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -72.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -235.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 290.5% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -2391.4% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -2266.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 56.6% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
