vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) and Ohmyhome Ltd (OMH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cellectis S.A. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.5M vs $5.2M, roughly 1.8× Ohmyhome Ltd). Ohmyhome Ltd runs the higher net margin — -32.6% vs -265.9%, a 233.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cellectis S.A. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (375.0% vs 58.1%). Cellectis S.A. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.6M vs $-599.2K).
Cellectis is a French biopharmaceutical company. It develops genome-edited chimeric antigen receptor T-cell technologies for cancer immunotherapy. It has offices in Paris, New York City, and Raleigh, North Carolina.
Ohmyhome Ltd is a leading Southeast Asian proptech firm offering end-to-end residential property services including home sales, rentals, mortgage advisory, and conveyancing solutions. Operating primarily in Singapore and Malaysia, it connects property owners, prospective buyers, tenants, and licensed agents to streamline real estate transactions for all user groups.
CLLS vs OMH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2024 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5M | $5.2M |
| Net Profit | $-25.3M | $-1.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.4% |
| Operating Margin | -181.1% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | -265.9% | -32.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 375.0% | 58.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -51.9% | -1.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | $-0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $2.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.3M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 23 | $-17.5M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-16.6M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-19.5M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.4% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 97.3% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 87.9% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -181.1% | -61.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | -1258.1% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -1180.5% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -1003.0% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -265.9% | -51.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | -1064.1% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -831.6% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -714.4% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 23 | $-0.31 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-0.42 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $149.0M | $4.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $379.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $148.6M | $6.7M |
| Total Assets | $407.1M | $9.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.06× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $149.0M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $84.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $129.4M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $379.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $607.6K | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.6M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 23 | $76.1M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $96.6M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $180.5M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $407.1M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 23 | $209.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $227.7M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $320.9M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.9M | $-496.2K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.6M | $-599.2K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 290.5% | -11.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.2% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $-496.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-47.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-60.2M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-599.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-47.9M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-61.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | -11.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 290.5% | -45.8% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -2391.4% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -2266.7% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 56.6% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
