vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) and SOLAI Ltd (SLAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SOLAI Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.0M vs $9.5M, roughly 1.2× Cellectis S.A.). SOLAI Ltd runs the higher net margin — -126.2% vs -265.9%, a 139.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cellectis S.A. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (375.0% vs -43.1%). Cellectis S.A. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($27.6M vs $-17.0M).
Cellectis is a French biopharmaceutical company. It develops genome-edited chimeric antigen receptor T-cell technologies for cancer immunotherapy. It has offices in Paris, New York City, and Raleigh, North Carolina.
CLLS vs SLAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2024 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5M | $11.0M |
| Net Profit | $-25.3M | $-13.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 0.1% |
| Operating Margin | -181.1% | -126.2% |
| Net Margin | -265.9% | -126.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 375.0% | -43.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -51.9% | -173.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 23 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $2.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-13.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.3M | $18.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | $-17.5M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-16.6M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-19.5M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 97.3% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 87.9% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | -126.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -181.1% | -2.6% | ||
| Q3 23 | -1258.1% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -1180.5% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -1003.0% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | -126.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -265.9% | 97.9% | ||
| Q3 23 | -1064.1% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -831.6% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -714.4% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 23 | $-0.31 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-0.42 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $149.0M | $1.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $148.6M | $43.8M |
| Total Assets | $407.1M | $69.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $149.0M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $84.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $129.4M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.6M | $45.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | $76.1M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $96.6M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $180.5M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $407.1M | $63.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | $209.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $227.7M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $320.9M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.9M | $-17.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.6M | $-17.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 290.5% | -154.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.2% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $-17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $-12.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-47.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-60.2M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-47.9M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-61.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | -154.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 290.5% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -2391.4% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -2266.7% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 56.6% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.64× | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLLS
Segment breakdown not available.
SLAI
| Data center | $6.5M | 59% |
| Cryptocurrency mining | $4.6M | 41% |
